Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Valley Transp. System v. Reinartz, 197 P.2d 269.

36 citing documents.

Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
v. Reinartz, (“prejudice [is] presumed to exist where improper evidence is admitted upon which the jury might act”).
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(statutory duty to move stalled vehicle off the roadway); , (motor vehicle statute); , (statute prohibiting the sale of liquor to an intoxicated person), overruled in part by Ontiveros
Perkins v. Komarnyckyj 834 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1992
Perkins v. Komarnyckyj 834 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1992
v. Reinartz, , (prejudice presumed “where improper evidence is admitted upon which the jury might act or improper instructions of law are given which might mislead the jury”).
Boy v. I.T.T. Grinnell Corp. 724 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Boy v. I.T.T. Grinnell Corp. 724 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Dyer v. Best Pharmacal 577 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Dyer v. Best Pharmacal 577 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Christy v. Baker, 7 Ariz.App.
Department of Property Valuation v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. 546 P.2d 804 Ariz. 1976
Department of Property Valuation v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. 546 P.2d 804 Ariz. 1976
Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Jackson 517 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Jackson 517 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Ong v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. 503 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Ong v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. 503 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Harris v. Thompson 500 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Harris v. Thompson 500 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Hall v. Mertz 480 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Hall v. Mertz 480 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
ung Candy & , ; , , ; , ; , , ; , , , Cobb v. Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association, , Pratt & , ; Hidalgo v. Cochise County
Melvin v. Stevens 458 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Melvin v. Stevens 458 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State ex rel. Herman v. Wilson 422 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State ex rel. Herman v. Wilson 422 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Coyner Crop Dusters v. Marsh 367 P.2d 208 Ariz. 1962
Coyner Crop Dusters v. Marsh 367 P.2d 208 Ariz. 1962
is very clear that : “ * * * Passion and prejudice are presumed to exist where improper evidence is admitted upon which the jury might act or improper instructions of law are given which might mislead the jury.
Campbell v. Brinson 360 P.2d 211 Ariz. 1961
Campbell v. Brinson 360 P.2d 211 Ariz. 1961
Cobb v. Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n, , .
Romero v. Cooper 325 P.2d 412 Ariz. 1958
Romero v. Cooper 325 P.2d 412 Ariz. 1958
Edwards v. Gaston 252 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1953
Edwards v. Gaston 252 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1953
Citizens Utilities Co. v. Firemen's Ins. Co. 240 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1952
Citizens Utilities Co. v. Firemen's Ins. Co. 240 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1952
Tipton v. Burson 238 P.2d 1098 Ariz. 1951
Tipton v. Burson 238 P.2d 1098 Ariz. 1951