Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nichols v. City of Phoenix, 202 P.2d 201.

92 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Hon. aragon/max Fontes Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Hon. aragon/max Fontes Ariz. 2022
For example, –29 (1949), a driver ran a stop sign and collided with a city bus that was speeding and not keeping a lookout.
Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc. 271 P.3d 1104 Ariz. 2012
Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc. 271 P.3d 1104 Ariz. 2012
Rimondi v. Briggs 606 P.2d 412 Ariz. 1980
Rimondi v. Briggs 606 P.2d 412 Ariz. 1980
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
the court held it was foreseeable that another driver might break the speed limit; in Campbell v. City of Tucson, 4 Ariz.App.
Lewis v. Wolf 596 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Lewis v. Wolf 596 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Ellis v. Caristi 572 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Ellis v. Caristi 572 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Central Alarm of Tucson v. Ganem 567 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Central Alarm of Tucson v. Ganem 567 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
[Citations omitted]” The broad rule of law that a third person’s criminal act can never be the natural sequence in the link of circumstances leading up to an injury, but must be considered as the efficient proximate cause, enunciated in Crandall v. Consolidated Tel., etc., Co., , 127 P. 994 (1912)
Ray v. Starr 539 P.2d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Ray v. Starr 539 P.2d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Taylor v. Mueller 539 P.2d 517 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Taylor v. Mueller 539 P.2d 517 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
that the favored driver must yield “to a motorist when .
Porterie v. Peters 532 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1975
Porterie v. Peters 532 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1975
Seifert v. Owen 460 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Seifert v. Owen 460 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
281 , reversed on other grounds
Arizona State Highway Department v. Bechtold 460 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1969
Arizona State Highway Department v. Bechtold 460 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1969
Esquivel v. Nancarrow 450 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1969
Wells v. Tanner Brothers Contracting Company 439 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1968
Wells v. Tanner Brothers Contracting Company 439 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1968
Higgins v. Kittleson 401 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Higgins v. Kittleson 401 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
A motion for a directed verdict admits “the truth of whatever competent evidence the opposing party had introduced including the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom * *
Hunsaker v. Smith 399 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Hunsaker v. Smith 399 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Stearman v. Miranda 396 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1964
Stearman v. Miranda 396 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1964
207: “Liability for one’s negligent acts cannot be predicated upon negligence alone.
Peterson v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 391 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1964
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Parr 391 P.2d 575 Ariz. 1964
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Parr 391 P.2d 575 Ariz. 1964
Dobbertin v. Johnson 390 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1964
Dobbertin v. Johnson 390 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1964
Egurrola v. Szychowski 388 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1964
Egurrola v. Szychowski 388 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1964
relied on by defendant, is not authority to the contrary.
Davis v. Weber 380 P.2d 608 Ariz. 1963
Davis v. Weber 380 P.2d 608 Ariz. 1963
Mutz v. Lucero 365 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1961
Mutz v. Lucero 365 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1961
Layne v. Hartung 348 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1960
Layne v. Hartung 348 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1960
that the driver of a vehicle on a favored highway could rightly assume that the driver of an automobile approaching an intersection would stop before entering the highway and the driver on the' favored highway could not be charged with negligence in acting upon the assumption, unless he continues on w
Nieman v. Jacobs 347 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1959
Nieman v. Jacobs 347 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1959
and Nichols *47 v. City of Phoenix, , .
Golfinos v. Southern Pacific Company 345 P.2d 780 Ariz. 1959
Golfinos v. Southern Pacific Company 345 P.2d 780 Ariz. 1959