Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc., 216 P.2d 404.

46 citing documents.

Silver v. Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. 384 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Silver v. Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. 384 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
17 SILVER et al. v. PUEBLO et al. Opinion of the Court determined that Pueblo, in developing Tribute, had both a 1972 CC&N and a reasonable and beneficial use for the water.
Canty v. Canty 874 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Canty v. Canty 874 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
See Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc., , (when the issue involves public policy estoppel does not apply).
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
For instance, in the exercise of its statutorily-derived power to issue or deny a certificate of convenience and necessity, the Commission “performs a judicial function which imposes upon the Commission the duty to hear before it condemns, to proceed upon inquiry, and to render judgment only after trial.”
Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 772 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 772 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
James P. Paul Water Co. v. ARIZ. CORP. COM'N 671 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1983
James P. Paul Water Co. v. ARIZ. CORP. COM'N 671 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1983
James P. Paul Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 671 P.2d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
James P. Paul Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 671 P.2d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
§§ 40-281 to 285 and to issue such a certificate only when there has been an adequate showing that the issuance will serve the “public interest.”
State Ex Rel. Dandoy v. City of Phoenix 651 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State Ex Rel. Dandoy v. City of Phoenix 651 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co. 569 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co. 569 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Kunkle Transfer & Storage Co. v. Superior Court 526 P.2d 1270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Kunkle Transfer & Storage Co. v. Superior Court 526 P.2d 1270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc.
Fernandez v. Arizona Water Co. 516 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Fernandez v. Arizona Water Co. 516 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Tucson Insurance & Bonding Agency 415 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Tucson Insurance & Bonding Agency 415 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. 406 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. 406 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
ion: Insofar as The Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Company’s first position is: concerned, i. e., that the corporation commission has primary jurisdiction and that a complaining public service corporation must first exhaust administrative remedies before' that body antecedent to seeking injunctive relief, it would seem that the cases of Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc., , , (1950), , , (1955), are controllifig and adverse to that contention.
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co. 398 P.2d 114 Ariz. 1964
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co. 398 P.2d 114 Ariz. 1964
Whitfield Transportation v. Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co., , ; , ; , ; , .
Davis v. Corporation Commission 393 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1964
Davis v. Corporation Commission 393 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1964
In Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc., , , we said: “Certificates of convenience and necessity can only be acquired from the corporation commission by an affirmative showing that its issuance would best serve the public interest and not by estoppel or laches.” The same principle applies where res-, judicata is urged as a ground for co
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Gibbons 344 P.2d 167 Ariz. 1959
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Gibbons 344 P.2d 167 Ariz. 1959
Its function is to hear the evidence, weigh the facts, and arrive at a determination based upon those facts, , .
Walker v. De Concini 341 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1959
Walker v. De Concini 341 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1959
stated as follows: “The corporation commission in issuing or denying a certificate of convenience and necessity performs a judicial function which imposes upon the commission the duty to hear before it condemns, to proceed upon inquiry and to render judgment only after trial.
George v. Arizona Corporation Commission 322 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1958
George v. Arizona Corporation Commission 322 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1958
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc., supra; , .
Whitfield Transportation, Inc. v. Reliable Transportation Co. 316 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1957
Whitfield Transportation, Inc. v. Reliable Transportation Co. 316 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1957
Upon authority of the Whitfield decisions, supra; , , , , the judgment is affirmed.
Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. Old Pueblo Transit Co. 289 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1955
Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. Old Pueblo Transit Co. 289 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1955
Corporation Commission of Arizona v. People’s Freight Line, Inc., 1932, , ; , .
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al's Transfer, Inc. 271 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1954
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al's Transfer, Inc. 271 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1954
Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Brooks 220 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1950
Metropolitan Lines, Inc. v. Brooks 220 P.2d 480 Ariz. 1950
Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Brooks 220 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1950
It will be noted that both of these •cases are germane to and stem from the controversy decided by this court on March 13, 1950, , , hereinafter referred to as cause No. 4988.
Metropolitan Lines, Inc. v. Brooks 220 P.2d 480 Ariz. 1950
International Life Ins. Co. v. Sorteberg 216 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1950
International Life Ins. Co. v. Sorteberg 216 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1950
Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc., , .