DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Emery, 642 P.2d 838.

58 citing documents.

  • State v. Hensley 669 P.2d 58 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Hensley 669 P.2d 58 Ariz. 1983
    (holding that officers’ discussion about the death penalty after defendant had invoked his right to silence was the functional equivalent of interrogation).
  • State v. Ashelman 671 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Ashelman 671 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Allred 655 P.2d 1331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Allred 655 P.2d 1331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
    In fact, , the court found that a prior inconsistent statement concerning whether the witness saw the accused stab the victim would have been substantively admissible into evidence had the state given the witness an opportunity to explain the prior inconsistent statement.
  • State v. Sorrell 645 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Sorrell 645 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1982
    Of course, an accused may change his mind after he has elected to remain silent and decide to speak, , Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 , 100 S.Ct.