Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Phoenix v. Yates, 208 P.2d 1147.

100 citing documents.

Speros v. Yu 83 P.3d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Liristis v. American Family Mut.
In Re Cameron T. 949 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
In Re Cameron T. 949 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Industrial Development Authority v. Maricopa County 944 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Industrial Development Authority v. Maricopa County 944 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Williams v. Thude 934 P.2d 1349 Ariz. 1997
Williams v. Thude 934 P.2d 1349 Ariz. 1997
“Each word, phrase, clause, and sentence [of a statute] must be given meaning so that no part will be void, inert, redundant, or trivial.” , (emphasis added).
State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Finally, “[ejach word, phrase, clause, and sentence must be given meaning so that no part will be void, inert, redundant, or trivial.”
Estate of Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents 838 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Estate of Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents 838 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Chalmers v. City of Tucson 829 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Chalmers v. City of Tucson 829 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
Both common sense and the rules of statutory construction forbid equating the terms “automobile liability” and “motor vehicle liability” policies because “[e]ach word, phrase, clause, and sentence must be given meaning so that no part will be void, inert, redundant, or trivial.”
Walker v. City of Scottsdale 786 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Walker v. City of Scottsdale 786 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
United States v. Mehrmanesh, 689 F.2d 822 (9th Cir. 1982).
Benjamin v. Arizona Department of Revenue 786 P.2d 1033 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Benjamin v. Arizona Department of Revenue 786 P.2d 1033 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
In re Rubi 713 P.2d 1225 Ariz. 1985
Weitekamp v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 709 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Weitekamp v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 709 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Barnett 691 P.2d 683 Ariz. 1984
State v. Barnett 691 P.2d 683 Ariz. 1984
Yauch v. State, City of Tucson
Davis v. Hidden 606 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Davis v. Hidden 606 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Cohen v. State 588 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Boykin 538 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1975
State v. Boykin 538 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1975
Yauch v. State, City of Tucson 514 P.2d 709 Ariz. 1973
Yauch v. State, City of Tucson 514 P.2d 709 Ariz. 1973
State v. Boykin 508 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1973
State v. Boykin 508 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1973
State v. Boykin 502 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Boykin 502 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
*367 may be necessary to put this provision into effect, and shall prescribe proper penalties for any violations of said laws.” This constitutional provision is not self-executing, , and the legislative implementation of it is found in A.R.S.
Camerena v. Department of Public Welfare 449 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Edwards 446 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1968
State v. Edwards 446 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1968
As a rule of construction, ejusdem generis means: “Where general words follow the enumeration of particular classes of persons or things, the general words should be construed as applicable only to persons or things of the same general nature or *489 class of those enumerated.”
Overson v. City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment 421 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1966
Overson v. City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment 421 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1966
Grace v. Maricopa County Board of SuperVisors 359 P.2d 73 Ariz. 1961
Grace v. Maricopa County Board of SuperVisors 359 P.2d 73 Ariz. 1961
1149 ; , ; , ; State v. Jaastad, supra; , at pages 19, 20, .
Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, Phoenix 351 P.2d 1104 Ariz. 1960
Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, Phoenix 351 P.2d 1104 Ariz. 1960
Parrack v. City of Phoenix 329 P.2d 1103 Ariz. 1958
Parrack v. City of Phoenix 329 P.2d 1103 Ariz. 1958
If it does, it is void; , ; , 276 P. 325 ; and we should not grant mandamus to force a compliance with it.
Bohannan v. Corporation Commission 313 P.2d 379 Ariz. 1957
Bohannan v. Corporation Commission 313 P.2d 379 Ariz. 1957
certiorari denied 329 U.S. 784 , 67 S.Ct.
Adams v. Bolin 247 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1952
Adams v. Bolin 247 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1952

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by