Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Inc., 195 P.2d 562.

32 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. City of Tucson Ariz. 2021
State of Arizona v. City of Tucson Ariz. 2021
State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewit 399 P.3d 663 Ariz. 2017
State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewit 399 P.3d 663 Ariz. 2017
§ 9-284(B); see City of Tucson v. Ariz. Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (Arizona ASAE), , (noting that § 9-284’s predecessor statute “supplements” article 13, section 2 of the Arizona Constitution).
City of Scottsdale v. State 352 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
City of Scottsdale v. State 352 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 16 Relying on City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (‘Arizona ASAE”), , , the City nevertheless asserts that its local ordinance addresses “matters of strictly local municipal concern,” and is thus protected from state legislative interference.
U-Haul v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
U-Haul v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Inc.
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
McMann v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
McMann v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Union Transportes De Nogales v. City of Nogales 985 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1999
Union Transportes De Nogales v. City of Nogales 985 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1999
(when the mode of exercising a clearly delegated charter power is not prescribed in the charter, the city can exercise the power in any usual and appropriate manner).
City of Tucson v. State 957 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
City of Tucson v. State 957 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Shaffer v. Allt 545 P.2d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Shaffer v. Allt 545 P.2d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
As previously indicated, the power of a charter city is subject to state regulation when the power sought to be exercised is “of statewide application and interest.”
Heiner v. City of Mesa 515 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Heiner v. City of Mesa 515 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Town of Gila Bend v. Hughes 477 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Town of Gila Bend v. Hughes 477 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Phoenix Respirator & Ambulance Service, Inc. v. McWilliams 468 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Phoenix Respirator & Ambulance Service, Inc. v. McWilliams 468 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Plaintiff argues that the rule of City of Phoenix v. Breuninger, supra, , allows cities to-enact ordinances covering the same subject matter as a state statute so long as the city’s ordinance is more stringent.
Arizona Fence Contractors Ass'n v. City of Phoenix Advisory & Appeals Board 436 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Arizona Fence Contractors Ass'n v. City of Phoenix Advisory & Appeals Board 436 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
The power of a charter city is subject to state legislation only when the statutes are “ * * * general laws of state-wide application and interest *
City of Phoenix v. Arizona Sash, Door & Glass Co. 293 P.2d 438 Ariz. 1956
City of Phoenix v. Arizona Sash, Door & Glass Co. 293 P.2d 438 Ariz. 1956
Strode v. Sullivan 236 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1951
Strode v. Sullivan 236 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1951
Since the early case of Yuma Gas, Light & Water Co. v. City of Yuma, 1919, , 178 P. 26 , down to and including the late cases of City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate Club, 1945, , ; Maxwell v. Fleming, 1946, , ; and City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, 1948, , , this court has uniformly held that a city charter, when regularly adopted and approved, becomes the organic law of the city and the provisions of the charter supersede all laws of the state in conflict with su
Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. Randall 196 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1948
Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. Randall 196 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1948
’ , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Inc., , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by