Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Peterson v. Sundt, 195 P.2d 158.
- State v. Medina 418 P.3d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
-
State v. Medina
418 P.3d 1134
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Kaiser , , 246, , 76 (1973), quoting Peterson v. Sundt , , 318
- State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
-
State v. Atwood
832 P.2d 593
Ariz. 1992
We recognize that an offer of proof may not be necessary if “the purpose and purport of the testimony expected to be elicited is obvious.” Kaiser, 109 Ariz. at 246 , 508 P.2d at 76
- Marriage of Molloy v. Molloy 761 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- Marriage of Molloy v. Molloy 761 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- Jones v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co. 700 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1985
- Jones v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co. 700 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Wilson 626 P.2d 152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
-
State v. Wilson
626 P.2d 152
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Nor can we say that such an offer of proof was unnecessary in that the testimony that would have been adduced was obvious, , and Tate v. Connel, 3 Ariz.App.
- Gaston v. Hunter 588 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
-
Gaston v. Hunter
588 P.2d 326
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
See M. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 13, at 31 (1960)
- State v. Treadaway 568 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Treadaway 568 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Grijalva 533 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1975
-
State v. Grijalva
533 P.2d 533
Ariz. 1975
*478 It is the duty of this court to uphold statutes if the language will permit although the statute in question may not be “artfully drawn.”
- Long v. Garrett 527 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Long v. Garrett 527 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- State v. Kaiser 508 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1973
-
State v. Kaiser
508 P.2d 74
Ariz. 1973
Woodmen of the World Life Ins.
- Reynolds v. United Producers & Consumers Co-Operative 495 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Reynolds v. United Producers & Consumers Co-Operative 495 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Swift & Company v. State Tax Commission 462 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1969
- Swift & Company v. State Tax Commission 462 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1969
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 412 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1966
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 412 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1966
- Brazie v. Cannon & Wendt Electric Co. 405 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
-
Brazie v. Cannon & Wendt Electric Co.
405 P.2d 281
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
ally declared null and void on the ground that the same is unintelligible and meaningless unless it is so imperfect and so deficient in its details as to render it impossible of •execution and enforcement, and is susceptible of no reasonable construction that will support and give it effect, and the court finds itself unable to define the purpose and intent of the legislature.” at 320 , at 163 (1948).
- Kazal v. Kazal 402 P.2d 1001 Ariz. 1965
-
Kazal v. Kazal
402 P.2d 1001
Ariz. 1965
Because the trial judge who heard the evidence in the trial below is no longer a judge, a fact of which we can take judicial notice, , a remand for the sole purpose of • permitting ‘findings of' fact in the present case would likewise “serve no useful purpose.” Cf. Ariz.R.Civ.P.
- McKinley v. Reilly 393 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1964
-
McKinley v. Reilly
393 P.2d 268
Ariz. 1964
195 * , 202 P. 391 ; , 108 P. 482 .
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 373 P.2d 722 Ariz. 1962
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 373 P.2d 722 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
- State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
- Peterson v. Flood 326 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1958
-
Peterson v. Flood
326 P.2d 845
Ariz. 1958
Reading the various sections of the statutes enumerated above, and under the clear duty of the courts to give meaningful operation to all its provisions, , ; , ; , 202 P. 391 ; we hold the legislature has granted to justice courts the power to suspend/the imposition of sentence and place defendants on probation.
- State v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. 307 P.2d 908 Ariz. 1957
- State v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. 307 P.2d 908 Ariz. 1957