Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Morgan v. Board of Sup'rs, 192 P.2d 236.

33 citing documents.

We the People Ex Rel. v. Governor Doug Ducey Ariz. 2021
We the People Ex Rel. v. Governor Doug Ducey Ariz. 2021
.” Morgan v. Board of Sup’rs
Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson Ariz. 2020
Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson Ariz. 2020
Where an election is contested on the ground of illegal voting, the contestant has the burden of showing that sufficient illegal votes were cast to change the result, Morgan v. Board of Sup’rs
Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District 33 857 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District 33 857 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Moore v. City of Page, supra.
Huggins v. Superior Court 788 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1990
Huggins v. Superior Court 788 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1990
The morgan-millet rule A challenger’s , where this court quoted the following statement from C.J.S.: Legality of votes.
Clay v. Town of Gilbert 773 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Clay v. Town of Gilbert 773 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Moore v. City of Page 713 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Moore v. City of Page 713 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
our supreme court quoted with approval the general rule as expressed in 29 C.J.S.
Tucson Community Development & Design Center, Inc. v. City of Tucson 641 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tucson Community Development & Design Center, Inc. v. City of Tucson 641 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Washington School District No. 6 v. Superior Court 541 P.2d 1137 Ariz. 1975
Washington School District No. 6 v. Superior Court 541 P.2d 1137 Ariz. 1975
Morgan v. Board of Sup’rs.
Gallegos v. Garcia 480 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Gallegos v. Garcia 480 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
SCHOOL DIST. NO. 26 (BOUSE ELEM.) OF YUMA CO. v. Strohm 469 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1970
SCHOOL DIST. NO. 26 (BOUSE ELEM.) OF YUMA CO. v. Strohm 469 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1970
While we have previously approved bond elections held pursuant to Article 7, § 13, , , it is unnecessary to reach this question posed by the trial court ruling.
Barcon v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 40, MIAMI AREA SCHOOLS 441 P.2d 540 Ariz. 1968
Barcon v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 40, MIAMI AREA SCHOOLS 441 P.2d 540 Ariz. 1968
the appellant, a soldier, claimed that his statutory tax exemption was equivalent to making him a taxpayer, and, therefore, he was a real property taxpayer and entitled to vote in a school district bond election.
Millet v. Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County 429 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Millet v. Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County 429 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Although the procedure used to determine voter eligibility was not identical, , is sound and applicable to the instant procedure.
State v. Mills 370 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1962
State v. Mills 370 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1962
“The presumption is in general that provisions of state constitutions are self-executing.” Morgan v. Board of Sup’rs
Board of Supervisors of Pima County v. Harrington 333 P.2d 971 Ariz. 1958
Junker v. GLENDALE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DIST. 236 P.2d 1010 Ariz. 1951
Junker v. GLENDALE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DIST. 236 P.2d 1010 Ariz. 1951
decided a somewhat related matter.
Roberts v. Spray 223 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1950
Roberts v. Spray 223 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1950
Boyd v. Bell 203 P.2d 618 Ariz. 1949
Boyd v. Bell 203 P.2d 618 Ariz. 1949