Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Axley, 646 P.2d 268.

124 citing documents.

State v. Martinez 854 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
“It is not error to refuse to give specifically requested instructions when the jury instructions given by the trial court adequately set forth the law applicable to the case.” , (citations omitted).
State v. Cramer 851 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Cramer 851 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
2142 , 90 L.Ed.2d 636 (1986); , 392
State v. Miller 844 P.2d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Miller 844 P.2d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
199 , 78 L.Ed.2d 174 (1983)
State v. Kempton 803 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Kempton 803 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Sanchez 797 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Sanchez 797 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
State v. Havatone 769 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Havatone 769 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Whitney 768 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1989
State v. Whitney 768 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1989
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Wagstaff 775 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Ferguson 717 P.2d 879 Ariz. 1986
State v. Ferguson 717 P.2d 879 Ariz. 1986
125 , 2 L.Ed.2d 78 (1957)
State v. Tyler 718 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Tyler 718 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Kelly 716 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Kelly 716 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Rule 13.3(a), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
State v. Acuna 710 P.2d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Acuna 710 P.2d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Since appellant was charged with separate crimes
State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
State v. Bauer 704 P.2d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Bauer 704 P.2d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Reyes 704 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Reyes 704 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Villafuerte, infra 142 Ariz. at 329, 690 P.2d at 48
State v. Amarillas 688 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1984
State v. Amarillas 688 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1984
State v. Gortarez 686 P.2d 1224 Ariz. 1984
State v. Gortarez 686 P.2d 1224 Ariz. 1984
Pending that appeal, Rivera still possessed his fifth amendment rights, , and was legally unavailable.
State v. Garcia 688 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Garcia 688 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Espinosa-Gamez 678 P.2d 1379 Ariz. 1984
State v. Espinosa-Gamez 678 P.2d 1379 Ariz. 1984