Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Gary's Estate, 211 P.2d 815.

40 citing documents.

Fish v. Industrial Commission 472 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Fish v. Industrial Commission 472 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Clint v. Northern Assur.
Carabetta v. Industrial Commission 469 P.2d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
d 389, 391 (1951): “While it is the law that the commission may reject the testimony of an interested *243 witness, it likewise is the law that it may not arbitrarily reject uncontradicted evidence when nothing intrinsic in the evidence itself or extrinsic in the circumstances casts suspicion thereon, , ; In re Gary’s Estate, , .” We think the rule is correctly summarized in M. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 3 at 10 (1960), as follows: “As a general rule the jury or other trier of fact is the
Reliable Electric Co. v. Clinton Campbell Contractor, Inc. 459 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
: “While it is the law that the commission may reject the testimony of an interested witness, it likewise is the law that it may not arbitrarily reject uncontradicted evidence when nothing intrinsic in the evidence itself or extrinsic in the circumstances casts suspicion thereon, , ; In re Gary’s Estate, , .” We think the rule is correctly summarized in M. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence Sec.
Dumes v. HAROLD LAZ ADVERTISING COMPANY 409 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Dumes v. HAROLD LAZ ADVERTISING COMPANY 409 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Russell v. Industrial Commission 402 P.2d 561 Ariz. 1965
Russell v. Industrial Commission 402 P.2d 561 Ariz. 1965
In re Gary’s Estate, , ; , .” 74 Ariz. at 349 , 248 P.2d at 998 .
Ft. Mohave Farms, Inc. v. Dunlap 393 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1964
Ft. Mohave Farms, Inc. v. Dunlap 393 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1964
England v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix 383 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1963
England v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix 383 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1963
Ireland v. Industrial Commission 370 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1962
Ireland v. Industrial Commission 370 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1962
It is the law of this state that “where evidence of an interested witness is corroborated by disinterested witnesses, a rejection of that evidence amounts to arbitrary action by the triers of fact.” ] ; In re Gary’s Estate, *138
In Re Lamfrom's Estate 368 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1962
Recictenwald v. Lockard 368 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1962
In re Gary’s Estate, , In re Brelm’s Estate
In Re Lamfrom's Estate 368 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1962
Buzard v. Griffin 358 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1960
Buzard v. Griffin 358 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1960
In re Gary’s Estate, , .
In Re the Estate of Schade 351 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1960
In Re the Estate of Schade 351 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1960
In re Gary’s Estate, 69 Ariz, 228, .
Colmenero Canal Company v. Babers 297 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1956
Colmenero Canal Company v. Babers 297 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1956
49 Am.Jur., Specific Performance, section 23; In re Gary’s Estate, , .
Fritsche v. Hudspeth 262 P.2d 243 Ariz. 1953
Martin v. Industrial Commission 257 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1953
Martin v. Industrial Commission 257 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1953
v. De Johnson, , 286 P. 817 ; In re Gary’s Estate, , ; , ; , .
Ratley v. Industrial Commission 248 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1952
Ratley v. Industrial Commission 248 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1952
In re Gary’s Estate, , ; , .
Wilson v. Metheny 236 P.2d 34 Ariz. 1951
Wilson v. Metheny 236 P.2d 34 Ariz. 1951
Thornburg v. Elgas 228 P.2d 448 Ariz. 1951
Thornburg v. Elgas 228 P.2d 448 Ariz. 1951
In re Gary’s Estate, , ; , .
Stanley v. Moan 227 P.2d 389 Ariz. 1951
Stanley v. Moan 227 P.2d 389 Ariz. 1951
While it is the law that the commission may reject the testimony of an interested witness, it likewise is the law that it may not arbitrarily reject uncontradicted evidence when nothing intrinsic in the evidence itself or extrinsic in the circumstances casts suspicion thereon, , ; In re Gary’s Estate, , .
Clint v. Northern Assur. Co. 223 P.2d 401 Ariz. 1950
Clint v. Northern Assur. Co. 223 P.2d 401 Ariz. 1950
In Re Gary’s Estate, , , and cases cited therein.
Bragg v. Industrial Commission 223 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1950
Bragg v. Industrial Commission 223 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1950
In re Gary’s Estate, , extends the above rule.
American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Caldwell 216 P.2d 413 Ariz. 1950
American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Caldwell 216 P.2d 413 Ariz. 1950
In Re Gary’s Estate, , , this court said: “ * * * We heretofore held 'but they (triers of the facts) may not arbitrarily reject uncontradicted evidence when nothing intrinsic in the evidence itself or extrinsic in the circumstances of the case casts suspicion thereon.’ (Citing cases.)