Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Newhall v. McGill, 212 P.2d 764.

47 citing documents.

Mashler v. Mashler 442 P.3d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mashler v. Mashler 442 P.3d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Matter of Estate of Ryan 928 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Estate of Ryan 928 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Estate of Krokowsky 896 P.2d 247 Ariz. 1995
Matter of Estate of Krokowsky 896 P.2d 247 Ariz. 1995
Feitler v. LaChance 883 P.2d 427 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Feitler v. LaChance 883 P.2d 427 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Wills are to be liberally construed to effectuate the testator’s intent, including holographic wills like Janya’ , (holographic will made by nonlawyer should be liberally construed); In re Harber’s Estate, , , 33 (1965).
Tash v. Saunders 736 P.2d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Tash v. Saunders 736 P.2d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
We find the two cases cited by appellants, , , to be inapplicable to this case since they involved subject matter jurisdiction.
Matter of Estate of Smith 580 P.2d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Matter of Estate of Smith 580 P.2d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Matter of Estate of Stephens 574 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Matter of Estate of Stephens 574 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Feffer v. Newman 497 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Feffer v. Newman 497 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
In Re Estate of Kidd 479 P.2d 697 Ariz. 1971
Cerny v. First National Bank 479 P.2d 697 Ariz. 1971
In Re Estate of Kidd 479 P.2d 697 Ariz. 1971
to be as follows: "The cardinal rules for construction of all wills is to ascertain the intention of the testator, and this intention is to be ascertained from the words of his will, taking into view when necessary or appropriate the circumstances under which it was made.
Cerny v. First National Bank 467 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Cerny v. First National Bank 467 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Isaak v. Superior •Court, , In re Estate of Harber, supra; Newhall •v. McGill, , ; Estate of Miller, , ; Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 P. 767 (1915); , 137 P. 426 (1914).
Brewer v. Peterson 453 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Brewer v. Peterson 453 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Estate of Baxter, , , 240 P. 280, 282 (1925); In re Estate of Daley, 6 Ariz.App.
Baker v. First National Bank 448 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Baker v. First National Bank 448 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
In re Estate of Gardiner, 5 Ariz.App.
Isaak v. Superior Court 443 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1968
Isaak v. Superior Court 443 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1968
Palms Clinic & Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Society for Crippled Children & Adults, Inc. 433 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In Re Estate of Daley 433 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In Re Estate of Daley 433 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Palms Clinic & Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Society for Crippled Children & Adults, Inc. 433 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
* * * It is an elementary rule in the construction of wills that the language used must be liberally construed with a view to carrying into effect what the will as a whole shows was the real intent of the testator.”
Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. Gardiner 425 P.2d 427 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. Gardiner 425 P.2d 427 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In Re Estate of Harber 409 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1965
In Re Estate of Harber 409 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1965
Doss v. Kalas 383 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1963
Doss v. Kalas 383 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1963
In Re Rowland's Estate 241 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1952
Discombe v. Cuthbert 241 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1952
In Re Rowland's Estate 241 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1952
Discombe v. Cuthbert 241 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1952
In Re Conness'estate 240 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1952
Mohan v. First Nat. Bank 240 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1952
In Re Conness'estate 240 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1952
Mohan v. First Nat. Bank 240 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1952