Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phelps Dodge Corporation v. Ford, 203 P.2d 633.

27 citing documents.

State v. Lynch 562 P.2d 1386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Lynch 562 P.2d 1386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Bade v. Drachman, 4 Ariz.App.
Vigue v. Noyes 550 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1976
Vigue v. Noyes 550 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1976
take judicial notice that “the propensity of horses to fight with and bite each other is a normal trait of horses.” There is no evidence to support such a statement and “[i]n order for any tribunal * * * to take judicial notice of any fact, it must be so notoriously true as not to be subject to reasonable dispute or must be capable of immediate accurate demonstration.”
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
There is no evidence whatsoever as to the quantity of silicon dioxide, if any, in the general dust in the area, , nor is there any evidence that Candelaria was, because of his employment, exposed to any greater amount of dust than the people in- the area generally.
Employment Security Commission v. Myers 495 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Employment Security Commission v. Myers 495 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Spettigue v. Mahoney 445 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Spettigue v. Mahoney 445 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Realty Investment Co. 430 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Realty Investment Co. 430 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
*183 Bade v. Drachman, 4 Ariz.App.
Knight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 428 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Knight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 428 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 422 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 422 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
In Bade v. Drachman, supplemental opinion, , wherein we quoted from previous pronouncements of our Supreme Court to the effect that the matter as to which judicial notice is to be taken “ * * * must be capable of immediate accurate demonstration,” and must be “ * * * indisputable.” ( , )
Bade v. Drachman 417 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Cochise Sanitary Services, Inc. v. Corporation Commission 410 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Cochise Sanitary Services, Inc. v. Corporation Commission 410 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Appellants first contend that the-judgment in the Visco case, supra, is not binding upon them and cite the following headnote: “Industrial commission and Supreme Court may take judicial notice of their own decisions or of the facts therein determined but binding effect is limited to parties litigant in the case.”
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Industrial Commission 402 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1965
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Industrial Commission 402 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1965
we said the Commission had “freedom to pursue whatever course its judgment dictates in gathering its facts so long as it has any basis whatever in logic * * * ” , , we said: “Because petitioner was working alone, he a
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 335 P.2d 416 Ariz. 1959
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 335 P.2d 416 Ariz. 1959
Since the burden of proof to establish the causation is on the claimant, , , it is the claimant’s burden to establish as a reasonable probability that the risk of exposure to silicosis was greater at his work site than the risk of exposure outside of the employment.
Orosco v. Poarch 222 P.2d 805 Ariz. 1950
Orosco v. Poarch 222 P.2d 805 Ariz. 1950
Counsel for the commission devoted most of his brief on the motion for rehearing in this case to a , , , .
Utah Const. Co. v. Berg 205 P.2d 367 Ariz. 1949
Utah Const. Co. v. Berg 205 P.2d 367 Ariz. 1949

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by