Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ingalls v. Neidlinger, 216 P.2d 387.

34 citing documents.

DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Followed DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Johnson, 126 Ariz. at 226 , 613 P.2d at 1282 .
State v. Sands 700 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Sands 700 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D. 636 P.2d 89 Ariz. 1981
Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D. 636 P.2d 89 Ariz. 1981
Norton v. First Federal Savings 624 P.2d 854 Ariz. 1981
Radcliffe v. Hilton Inn 580 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Radcliffe v. Hilton Inn 580 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Cook v. Cook 547 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Cook v. Cook 547 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Burrell v. Southern Pacific Company 474 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Burrell v. Southern Pacific Company 474 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
MacNeil v. Perkins, 1958, , ; Ingalls v. Neidlinger, 1950, , ; and State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Smith 431 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Smith 431 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966
Serrano v. Kenneth A. Ethridge Contracting Co. 409 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Serrano v. Kenneth A. Ethridge Contracting Co. 409 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
City of Glendale v. ARIZONA S. & L., IN RECEIVERSHIP 409 P.2d 299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
City of Glendale v. ARIZONA S. & L., IN RECEIVERSHIP 409 P.2d 299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
The Restatement of the Law of Property, which will be followed in Arizona in the absence of controlling precedent, , states: “The successors in title to land respecting the use of which the owner has made a promise are not bound as promisors upon the promise unless it was intended by the parties to the promise that they should be so bound.” Restatement, Property, § 531, p. 3196.
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Small v. Ellis 367 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1961
Small v. Ellis 367 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1961
wherein we stated: *199 “We have repeatedly stated that where not bound by previous decisions of this court or legislative enactment we will follow the Restatement of the Law.
Irwin v. Murphey 302 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1956
Irwin v. Murphey 302 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1956
Rodriquez v. Terry 290 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1955
Rodriquez v. Terry 290 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1955
Old Pueblo Transit Co. v. Corporation Commission 236 P.2d 1018 Ariz. 1951
Old Pueblo Transit Co. v. Corporation Commission 236 P.2d 1018 Ariz. 1951
Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 236 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1951
Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 236 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1951