Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hughes v. Industrial Commission, 211 P.2d 463.

37 citing documents.

McMahan v. Grasshopper Ariz. 2026
Comm’n, Gordon, 35 Ariz. at 368; Ruffino, 245 Ariz. at 168–69 ¶ 10; Austin v. State ex rel.
Frazer Ryan v. Mayne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Frazer Ryan v. Mayne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, (establishing the test for void judgments).
Advanced Property Tax v. Jorge Othon and Spouse Ariz. 2023
Advanced Property Tax v. Jorge Othon and Spouse Ariz. 2023
Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election Ariz. 2023
Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election Ariz. 2023
Comm’n, ); –43 ¶ 22 (2020); Tube City Min.
David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
Comm’n, Walker, 113 Ariz. at 235; In re.
A.S., Zeth W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A.S., Zeth W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Comm'n, ("[A] void order of adoption has no validity or sanctity and may be attacked in a collateral proceeding."); (order void for lack of jurisdiction not subject to statutory time limits in A.R.S.
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25646 637 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25646 637 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Industrial Commission 606 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Industrial Commission 606 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Matter of Adoption of Hadtrath 592 P.2d 1262 Ariz. 1979
Matter of Adoption of Hadtrath 592 P.2d 1262 Ariz. 1979
Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.
Rios v. Industrial Commission 586 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Rios v. Industrial Commission 586 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State Ex Rel. Lassen v. Self-Realization Fellowship Church 517 P.2d 1280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State Ex Rel. Lassen v. Self-Realization Fellowship Church 517 P.2d 1280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente 501 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente 501 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
The Arizona Supreme Court decisions in Ulbrich, supra, , involved an indirect assumption that certain claimants might have been entitled to paragraph 8 death benefits if they had not been otherwise precluded under the actual fact situations involved in those cases from receiving benefits.
San Fernando Motors, Inc. v. Fowler 498 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
San Fernando Motors, Inc. v. Fowler 498 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Cooper v. Commonwealth Title of Arizona 489 P.2d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Cooper v. Commonwealth Title of Arizona 489 P.2d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
See e. g., , ; , Gage v. Gage, 11 Ariz.App.
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Collins v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1967
Collins v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1967
In re Minors 432 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In re Minors 432 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
(citations omitted) The matter of the jurisdiction of the superior court of Pima County to enter the interlocutory order of adoption' must be determined from thé judgment roll or documents of record in the adoption matter and not by extraneous matters, dehors that record.”
City of Tucson v. Simpson 323 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1958
City of Tucson v. Simpson 323 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1958
Civil Service Commission of City of Tucson v. Foley, 75 Ariz. *44 364, ; , ; , 264 P. 468 .
Civil Service Commission v. Foley 257 P.2d 384 Ariz. 1953
Civil Service Commission v. Foley 257 P.2d 384 Ariz. 1953