Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Treadway v. Industrial Commission, 213 P.2d 373.

28 citing documents.

crescent/twin City v. Ketterling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
crescent/twin City v. Ketterling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Comm’n, P.2d 373 (1950), which dealt with a claimant who contracted coccidioidomycosis, a fungal disease commonly known as “valley fever.” In Treadway, the claimant alleged that he contracted valley fever at work while unloading dusty tents from California at a Phoenix warehouse.
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Comm’n, -08, State Comp.
Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 840 P.2d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 840 P.2d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
After the Administrative Law Judge made this finding, , for the proposition that the commonalty rule precluded compensability for claimant’s Lyme disease.
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 614 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 614 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
.” , O’Connor v. Industrial Commission, 19 Ariz.App.
Ramonett v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ramonett v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
The Carrier would have the Court go further and hold that the statutory revision of 1973, supra, somehow weakened the authority of cases such as: , , , , et al., which treated as compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act disabilities caused by diseases not enumerated in the old occupational disease statute
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Crawford v. Industrial Commission 534 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Crawford v. Industrial Commission 534 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
43 , , it is our conclusion that the answer to the question is that it is not possible for a workman to sustain his burden of proving that he contracted valley fever as a result of his working conditions.
O'CONNOR v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
O'CONNOR v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Insurance Co. of North America v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Insurance Co. of North America v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Reilly v. Industrial Commission 398 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Reilly v. Industrial Commission 398 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
and that the terms “disease” and “accident” are no longer considered mutually exclusive.
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company 363 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1961
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company 363 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1961
Dunlap v. Industrial Commission 363 P.2d 600 Ariz. 1961
Dunlap v. Industrial Commission 363 P.2d 600 Ariz. 1961

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by