Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dawson v. McNaney, 223 P.2d 907.

41 citing documents.

QUEIROZ v. Harvey 205 P.3d 1120 Ariz. 2009
QUEIROZ v. Harvey 205 P.3d 1120 Ariz. 2009
(equitable rule will not be applied to “defeat the ends of justice” and “perpetrate a fraud”); (equity denies title to
Dressler v. Morrison 130 P.3d 978 Ariz. 2006
Dressler v. Morrison 130 P.3d 978 Ariz. 2006
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 989 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 989 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Mathes contends that Harris Trust did not cite a
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
THE "UNCLEAN HANDS” DEFENSE The trial court ruled that SMHS was not the proper party to assert the unclean hands defense because SMHS itself had “set the judicial machinery in motion.”
In Re the Marriage of Cupp 730 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In Re the Marriage of Cupp 730 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
the supreme court first held that workers’ compensation payments received during a marriage were community property.
Pyeatte v. Pyeatte 661 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Pyeatte v. Pyeatte 661 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
See, , , Chirekos v. Chirekos, 24 Ariz.App.
Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Jurek v. Jurek 606 P.2d 812 Ariz. 1980
Jurek v. Jurek 606 P.2d 812 Ariz. 1980
Flowers v. Flowers 578 P.2d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Chirekos v. Chirekos 537 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Chirekos v. Chirekos 537 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Nitrini v. Feinbaum 501 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Nitrini v. Feinbaum 501 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
The evidence, fairly construed, supports a finding of the necessary elements of a constructive trust, , and courts do not hesitate to impose constructive trusts when necessary to obtain complete justice.
Weller v. Weller 480 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Weller v. Weller 480 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Abner v. Arizona Newspapers, Inc. 463 P.2d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Abner v. Arizona Newspapers, Inc. 463 P.2d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
where our Supreme Court stated that a mere reference to the statute of limitations is so indefinite and uncertain as to not properly raise the question.
Brown v. Walls 457 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Brown v. Walls 457 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Cordoba v. Wiswall 436 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Cordoba v. Wiswall 436 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Luplow v. Pasqualetti Properties, Inc.
Kenyon v. Kenyon 425 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Kenyon v. Kenyon 425 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Visco v. First National Bank of Arizona 415 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Visco v. First National Bank of Arizona 415 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
England v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix 383 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1963
England v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix 383 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1963
Condos v. Felder 377 P.2d 305 Ariz. 1962
Condos v. Felder 377 P.2d 305 Ariz. 1962
Murillo v. Hernandez 281 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1955
Murillo v. Hernandez 281 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1955