Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dalglish, 639 P.2d 323.
- State v. Dalglish 901 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Dalglish 901 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Barger 810 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
State v. Barger
810 P.2d 191
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
138 Ariz. at 84 , 673 P.2d at 22 ; , (plaintiff’s statement to witness that he had denied stealing gasoline inadmissible under residual hearsay exception because statement highly suspect); , (where defendant claimed self-defense, his statement to another about how he had received black eye inadmissible hearsay); see also
- Mulhern v. City of Scottsdale 799 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- Mulhern v. City of Scottsdale 799 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1988
-
State v. Whittle
752 P.2d 494
Ariz. 1988
Vickers, 129 Ariz. at 513
- State v. Santanna 735 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1987
-
State v. Santanna
735 P.2d 757
Ariz. 1987
State v. Zamora, 140 Ariz. at 341 , 681 P.2d at 924 .
- State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
- State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
- State v. Cannon 713 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Cannon 713 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Ennis 689 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Ennis 689 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Graham 660 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Graham 660 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Celaya 660 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Celaya 660 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Jessen 657 P.2d 871 Ariz. 1982
-
State v. Jessen
657 P.2d 871
Ariz. 1982
* * * “The purpose of these rulings is to assure that the trial court makes a separate and definite threshold determination of admissibility before allowing the jury to consider the evidence.”
- State v. Cannon 650 P.2d 1198 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Cannon 650 P.2d 1198 Ariz. 1982