Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Tidwell v. Riggs, 222 P.2d 795.
- State v. Hollis 379 P.2d 750 Ariz. 1963
-
State v. Hollis
379 P.2d 750
Ariz. 1963
Rules of Supreme Court 5(c), 17 A.R.S.
- State ex rel. Ronan v. City of Phoenix 373 P.2d 368 Ariz. 1962
- State ex rel. Ronan v. City of Phoenix 373 P.2d 368 Ariz. 1962
- Butler v. Va Sant 365 P.2d 210 Ariz. 1961
- Butler v. Va Sant 365 P.2d 210 Ariz. 1961
- Martin v. Clark 297 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1956
-
Martin v. Clark
297 P.2d 934
Ariz. 1956
*352 , , Justice Udall, in writing the opinion for the court set out haec verba the assignments of error therein presented (very similar to the assignments in the instant case)' and the provisions of Rule 10 and painstakingly informed the Bar what would be the result of failure to comply with the rule.
- Bean v. Gorby 292 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1956
- Bean v. Gorby 292 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1956
- In Re Graham's Estate 239 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1951
- In Re Graham's Estate 239 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1951
- Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 236 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1951
-
Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.
236 P.2d 732
Ariz. 1951
See Tidwell v. Riggs, 1950, , , where the previous cases on this point are collected.
- Bassett v. Ryan 236 P.2d 458 Ariz. 1951
- Bassett v. Ryan 236 P.2d 458 Ariz. 1951
- Salyer v. Schmitt 232 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1951
-
Salyer v. Schmitt
232 P.2d 116
Ariz. 1951
and cases cited therein.
- Cecil v. Gila County 227 P.2d 217 Ariz. 1951
-
Cecil v. Gila County
227 P.2d 217
Ariz. 1951
One of the more recent cases so deciding, and in that case we collate the earlier decisions, , .
- Armstrong v. Armstrong 226 P.2d 168 Ariz. 1951
- Armstrong v. Armstrong 226 P.2d 168 Ariz. 1951
- Bragg v. Industrial Commission 223 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1950
-
Bragg v. Industrial Commission
223 P.2d 180
Ariz. 1950
Applicant sets forth further purported assignments Nos. 4 and 5 which under our rules and the decisions of this court, , .
- Campbell v. King 222 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1950
-
Campbell v. King
222 P.2d 980
Ariz. 1950
and cases collated therein.