Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gerlaugh, 659 P.2d 642.
- State v. Youngs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Youngs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
supplemented by P.2d 642 (1983).
- State v. Estrada 100 P.3d 452 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
- State v. Estrada 100 P.3d 452 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Schurz
859 P.2d 156
Ariz. 1993
See, , (death sentence set aside for defendant convicted on accomplice theory when possible principal sentenced to four years); , (Cameron, J., concurring) (apparent disparity justified by defendant’s greater participation in the crime and mitigating factors applicable to codefendant).
- State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
-
State v. Greenway
823 P.2d 22
Ariz. 1991
(codefendant was 18, a first offender and was less active in the commission of the crimes).
- State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
-
State v. Williams
698 P.2d 678
Ariz. 1985
1 The granting of a motion to sever is within the discretion of the trial court, , supplemented , and will not be reversed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion or demonstration of prejudice.
- State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Clabourne
690 P.2d 54
Ariz. 1984
( , supplemented in , ).
- State v. King 684 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. King 684 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Harding
687 P.2d 1247
Ariz. 1984
180 , 74 L.Ed.2d 147 (1982); , supplementing
- State v. Hauss 688 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Hauss 688 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Summerlin 675 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Summerlin
675 P.2d 686
Ariz. 1983
supplemented in , (citations omitted).
- State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Lambright
673 P.2d 1
Ariz. 1983
Similarly, , in which defendant Gerlaugh was also tried and sentenced to death, it was noted that the charges against an accomplice were disposed of through a comprehensive plea agreement under which he was given life sentences on some of the charges together with a twenty-one year sentence on another charge
- State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Harding
670 P.2d 383
Ariz. 1983
180 , 74 L.Ed.2d 147 (1982); , supplementing , .