Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McElyea, 635 P.2d 170.

28 citing documents.

State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 140 n.8 (1978); –88 (1981).
State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
–87 (1981) (finding no Confrontation Clause violation where defendant sought to question a witness about a subsequent criminal charge not subject to any plea agreement because there was no evidence it would have revealed that the witness had a bias or interest in testifying against a former codefendant); Fleming
State v. Todd 418 P.3d 1147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Todd 418 P.3d 1147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
607 ; State v. McElyea , , 187, , 172 (1981).
State v. Licon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Licon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
STATE v. LICON Decision of the Court 186-87 (1981) (affirming superior court’s limitation on cross-examining a witness about a criminal charge that would not have “revealed any bias or interest that the witness might hav
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
However, whether to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a witness’s personal choice, not his lawyer’-88 (1981) (citations omitted).
State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
587 n. 1, , 619 n. 1 (1983)
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
Rule 609(a), Arizona Rules of Evidence, 17A A.R.S.
State v. Sisneros 670 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1983
State v. Sisneros 670 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1983
The court properly applied the balancing test of State v. Ellerson, supra, and we find no abuse of discretion
State v. Davis 672 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Davis 672 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
The often reiterated test regarding alleged denial of the right to cross-examination is “whether the defendant has been denied the opportunity of presenting to the trier of fact information which bears either on the issues in the case or on the credibility of [the] witness.” State v. McElyea, Jr., , ( , ).