Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Haggard v. Industrial Commission, 223 P.2d 915.

55 citing documents.

Stinnett v. Az Vmeb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Stinnett v. Az Vmeb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Gutierrez v. Industrial Commission 243 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Gutierrez v. Industrial Commission 243 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Redelsperger v. City of Avondale 87 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Redelsperger v. City of Avondale 87 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Martinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 856 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Martinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 856 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Haggard v. Industrial Comm’n, , -22 (1950).
Hays v. Continental Insurance 838 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hays v. Continental Insurance 838 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of Nursing 796 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of Nursing 796 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Haggard v. Industrial Comm’n
Boyce v. City of Scottsdale 756 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Boyce v. City of Scottsdale 756 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Haggard v. Industrial Comm’n, , -22 (1950).
Cracchiolo v. State 706 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Cracchiolo v. State 706 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Energy Control Services, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 658 P.2d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Energy Control Services, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 658 P.2d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Town of Chino Valley v. State Land Department 580 P.2d 704 Ariz. 1978
Town of Chino Valley v. State Land Department 580 P.2d 704 Ariz. 1978
Adams v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Adams v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
1055 , 39 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974); Swift & , , State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente, 18 Ariz.App.
State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente 501 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente 501 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Ruth v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1971
Ruth v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1971
See also, Climate Control, , , Haggard v. Industrial Comm’n.
State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co. 484 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1971
State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co. 484 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1971
that the extent and cháracter of the rules and regulations ■authorized to be adopted by the legislature must be fixed in accordance with common sense and the inherent necessities of governmental coordination.
Industrial Commission v. Jordan 448 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Industrial Commission v. Jordan 448 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Mickelson v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Mickelson v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
y wage’ of an employee entitled to compensation, the work record is a factor to be considered when the injured employee is engaged in periodic or *189 spot employments which, , ; , ; , .
Southern Pacific Co. v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'N 404 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1965
Pacey v. Industrial Commission 377 P.2d 1015 Ariz. 1963
Pacey v. Industrial Commission 377 P.2d 1015 Ariz. 1963
’ of an employee entitled to compensation, the work record is a factor to be considered when the injü , , , .
Climate Control, Inc. v. Hill 349 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1960
Climate Control, Inc. v. Hill 349 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1960
Weiss v. Industrial Commission 347 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1959
Weiss v. Industrial Commission 347 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1959
State v. Wacker 344 P.2d 1004 Ariz. 1959
State v. Wacker 344 P.2d 1004 Ariz. 1959
that the extent and character of the.rules and regulations authorized to be-adopted by the legislature must be fixed ini accordance with common sense and the inherent necessities of governmental coordination.
Anthony A. Bianco, Inc. v. Hess 339 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1959
Anthony A. Bianco, Inc. v. Hess 339 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1959
that “It is the general rule, well established in Arizona, that a litigant may not claim affirmative relief under an act of the legislature and at the same time contend a relative portion of the act under which the relief is claimed is unconstitutional.
State v. Marana Plantations, Inc. 252 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1953
State v. Marana Plantations, Inc. 252 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1953
Corporation Commission v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States 239 P.2d 360 Ariz. 1951
Corporation Commission v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States 239 P.2d 360 Ariz. 1951
Alvord v. State Tax Commission, supra; , ; , ; , ; , ; , .
Field v. Industrial Commission 238 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1951
Field v. Industrial Commission 238 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1951
monthly wage” of an employee entitled to compensation, the work record is a , ; , ; , .
State v. Gee 236 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1951