Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Todaro v. Gardner, 231 P.2d 435.

36 citing documents.

Meno's construction/aig v. Reyes 442 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Meno's construction/aig v. Reyes 442 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co., (citations omitted); (“[T]he trial court, sitting without a jury, is judge of the credibility of witnesses, the weight of the evidence, and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.”) ().
Hernandez v. State 35 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Hernandez v. State 35 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Matter of One (1) Rolex Brand Man's Watch 860 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Matter of One (1) Rolex Brand Man's Watch 860 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Reynolds v. United Producers & Consumers Coop., 17 Ariz.App.
R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. Smith 836 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. Smith 836 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Campbell Estates, Inc. v. Bates 517 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Campbell Estates, Inc. v. Bates 517 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Greenwell v. Spellman 516 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1973
Greenwell v. Spellman 516 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1973
Ellingson v. Fuller 513 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Ellingson v. Fuller 513 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
In reviewing the evidence as a whole and the inferences to be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to upholding the trial judge’s decision, , , Rorebeck v. Criste, supra, we hold that there was adequate evidence to support the trial judge’s findings.
Dawson v. Vision-Air 485 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Dawson v. Vision-Air 485 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Fleming v. Becker 483 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Fleming v. Becker 483 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Viewing, as we must, the evidence concerning the existence or nonexistence of a loan, , we must assume that the court did not find in the foregoing evidence an agreement to repay the sum of money.
McElwain v. Schuckert 477 P.2d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
McElwain v. Schuckert 477 P.2d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
.” Of course there are situations where we will not accept the findings of the trier of fact, such as where the record contains no evidence to support such findings, , , or where a detailed examination of the evidence convinces this .Court that a reasonable and unprejudiced mind would reach a conclusion opposite that found by the trier of fact, Todaro v. Gardner, supra; Washington National Insurance v. Dale Benz, Inc., , .
Nace v. Nace 448 P.2d 76 Ariz. 1968
Nace v. Nace 448 P.2d 76 Ariz. 1968
Spector v. Spector 382 P.2d 659 Ariz. 1963
Spector v. Spector 382 P.2d 659 Ariz. 1963
Shun v. Hospital Benefit Association 357 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1960
Shun v. Hospital Benefit Association 357 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1960
Jenkins v. Industrial Commission 272 P.2d 601 Ariz. 1954
Jenkins v. Industrial Commission 272 P.2d 601 Ariz. 1954
that: “ * * * ‘where from the evidence it is clear that reasonable men can come to but one conclusion, we have never hesitated to set aside a jury’s finding contrary to such conclusion.
Brown v. City of Phoenix 272 P.2d 358 Ariz. 1954
Brown v. City of Phoenix 272 P.2d 358 Ariz. 1954
See Gillespie Land & , ; , .
Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. Siebrand 243 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1952
Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. Siebrand 243 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1952