Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Tiller v. Von Pohle, 230 P.2d 213.
- Francisco v. Affiliated Urologists Ariz. 2024
- Francisco v. Affiliated Urologists Ariz. 2024
- Grayson v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Grayson v. Banner
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ctr., (patient's leg burned during heart surgery), or the injury falls far outside the normal risks of receiving medical care, see, (surgeon left "a cloth sack of considerable size" in patient's abdomen).
- Rudy v. Meshorer 706 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
Rudy v. Meshorer
706 P.2d 1234
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
in which a large cloth sack was left in a woman’s , in which pieces of steel sutures were left in a patient after an operation.
- McWain v. Tucson General Hosp. 670 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
-
McWain v. Tucson General Hosp.
670 P.2d 1180
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
O'Donnell v. Maves, supra ; , Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
- Morrell v. St. Luke's Medical Center 556 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Morrell v. St. Luke's Medical Center
556 P.2d 334
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
REQUIREMENT OE EXPERT WITNESSES Even though appellant concedes that this is not the caliber of case allowing application of res ipsa loquitur, , , *490 he contends that requiring him to produce an expert to prove his complaint allegations of medical negligence denies him equal protection of the law.
- Riedisser v. Nelson 534 P.2d 1052 Ariz. 1975
-
Riedisser v. Nelson
534 P.2d 1052
Ariz. 1975
(rag left in abdomen of patient for two years).
- Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc. 501 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc. 501 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Towers v. Johnson 465 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Towers v. Johnson 465 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Almli v. Updegraff 447 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- Almli v. Updegraff 447 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- O'DONNELL v. Maves 436 P.2d 577 Ariz. 1968
- O'DONNELL v. Maves 436 P.2d 577 Ariz. 1968
- Harris v. Campbell 409 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
-
Harris v. Campbell
409 P.2d 67
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
(2) it must be caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of defendant; (3) it must not have been due to any voluntary action or contribution on th.e part of the plaintiff.”
- Nieman v. Jacobs 347 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1959
- Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Cathey 317 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1957
-
Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Cathey
317 P.2d 1094
Ariz. 1957
* * * ’ Prosser, Torts, pp. 308-309.” , .
- Capps v. American Airlines, Inc. 303 P.2d 717 Ariz. 1956
-
Capps v. American Airlines, Inc.
303 P.2d 717
Ariz. 1956
Phen v. All American Bus Lines, Inc., , ; Sawyer v. People’s Freight Lines, Inc., 42 Afiz.