Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McGuire, 638 P.2d 1339.

28 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider 311 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider 311 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
The requisite force required for an armed rob *89 bery need only “be used ‘against any person,’ not necessarily only against the person dispossessed of the property.” , ( , ); -94, ¶¶ 17-21 , -49 (App.2000).
State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
See Essman, 98 Ariz. at 235-36 , 403 P.2d at 545 ; , -96 , -42 (1981); -91 , -15 (1974).
State v. Rutledge 4 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Rutledge 4 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Accordingly, our supreme court has held that robbery requires “only that force be used ‘against any person,’ not necessarily only against the person dispossessed of the property.” , (upholding robbery conviction as to wife who was tied up in order to allow defendant to steal husband’s property); , (use of force against three store employees to prevent defendant’s taking of store property supp
State v. Riley 992 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Riley 992 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
§ 13-1902 requires only that force be used ‘against any person,’ not necessarily only against the person dispossessed of the property.”
State v. Strong 914 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Strong 914 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Ellison 819 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Ellison 819 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Lucas 794 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Lucas 794 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Ybarra 716 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Ybarra 716 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Meeker 693 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1984
State v. Meeker 693 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hamilton 688 P.2d 983 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hamilton 688 P.2d 983 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hankins 686 P.2d 740 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hankins 686 P.2d 740 Ariz. 1984