Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., 228 P.2d 993.

39 citing documents.

Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Sash & Door Co., Ariz. Const. art. 18, § 5.
D'Ambrosio v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
D'Ambrosio v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 343–43A.
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
§ 12-2505(A) (comparative negligence reduces damages proportionate to degree of fault); , (same); see generally Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , (contributory negligence not submitted to jury unless defendant’s negligence first shown).
Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Koepke v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. 682 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Koepke v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. 682 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Beach v. City of Phoenix 667 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Smedberg v. Simons 631 P.2d 530 Ariz. 1981
Smedberg v. Simons 631 P.2d 530 Ariz. 1981
See Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Ellis v. Caristi 572 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Ellis v. Caristi 572 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
As noted by appellees, Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , is couched in language of premises liability although it involved a power joiner.
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , Compton v. National Metals Company, 10 Ariz.App.
Maas v. Dreher 460 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Maas v. Dreher 460 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
65 , , , Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Compton v. National Metals Company 459 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Compton v. National Metals Company 459 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
1 A.L.R.3d 957 (1962); Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Daugherty v. Montgomery Ward 422 P.2d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Daugherty v. Montgomery Ward 422 P.2d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , the plaintiff lost three fingers while helping to plane some of his lumber on a mechanically operated machine at the defendant’s place of business.
Murphy v. El Dorado Bowl, Inc. 409 P.2d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Murphy v. El Dorado Bowl, Inc. 409 P.2d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
That the evidence presented by plaintiff did not constitute a showing of negligence on the part of the defendant.” The defendant relies upon the rule laid down in Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , in the second paragraph of the syllabus, which is in these words: “2.
Sherman v. Arno 383 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1963
Sherman v. Arno 383 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1963
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , Restatement, Torts § 343 ; 38 Am.Jur., Negligence § 97.
Pena v. Stewart 278 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1955
Pena v. Stewart 278 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1955
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , ; , .
Glowacki v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 263 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1953
Distinguished Glowacki v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 263 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1953
With respect to assignments of error Nos. 6 and 7 based upon defendant’s requested instructions 1 and 19 given by the court, we are of the view that they do not correctly state the law; that the case of Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , , is readily distinguishable and is not authority for such instructions.
Citizens Utilities Co. v. Firemen's Ins. Co. 240 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1952
Citizens Utilities Co. v. Firemen's Ins. Co. 240 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1952
Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , , head note 6.
Sanders v. Brown 238 P.2d 941 Ariz. 1951
Sanders v. Brown 238 P.2d 941 Ariz. 1951
Furthermore, if the plaintiff is correct as to his status on the premises, i. e., a business invitee, since the danger was obvious and reasonably apparent, the rule in Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , , would govern and he still could not recover as the defendant is not an insurer of either his business invitees or his guests.