Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Roberts v. Spray, 223 P.2d 808.

85 citing documents.

Iman v. Southern Pacific Company 435 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Iman v. Southern Pacific Company 435 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
our Supreme Court held that a complaint was properly dismissed on motion for failure to state a claim for relief where the motion squarely presented the question of whether a legislative enactment violated specified constitutional provisions for any of the reasons alleged in the complaint.
Bonnin v. Industrial Commission 432 P.2d 283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Bonnin v. Industrial Commission 432 P.2d 283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
it is stated on page 69 of the Arizona Reports 223 P.2d on page 814: “ * * * Questions as to the wisdom of the law, as to its expediency or concerning the soundness of policy outlined therein must be addressed to the legislature.
Turner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY FOR PIMA 415 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Turner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY FOR PIMA 415 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Atchison, Topeka & , 265 P. 602 , 58 A.L.R.
Application of Gault 407 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1965
Application of Gault 407 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1965
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Davis v. State, 1 Ariz.App.
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 405 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 405 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Iman v. Bolin 404 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1965
Iman v. Bolin 404 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1965
We said, , : "It is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that every intendment is in favor of the constitutionality of legislation, , , and unless its invalidity is established beyond a reasonable doubt it will be declared constitutional.
Davis v. State 401 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Davis v. State 401 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Arizona Tax Commission v. Dairy & Consumers Cooperative Ass’n
City of Mesa v. Killingsworth 394 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1964
City of Mesa v. Killingsworth 394 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1964
Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Company 346 P.2d 1101 Ariz. 1959
Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Company 346 P.2d 1101 Ariz. 1959
Whitney v. Bolin 330 P.2d 1003 Ariz. 1958
Whitney v. Bolin 330 P.2d 1003 Ariz. 1958
General Electric Co. v. Telco Supply, Inc. 325 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1958
General Electric Co. v. Telco Supply, Inc. 325 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1958
Black & , 218 P. 139 .
State v. Drew 316 P.2d 1108 Ariz. 1957
Brown v. Superior Court 303 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1956
Brown v. Superior Court 303 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1956
224, ; , ; Adams v. Bolin, supra, 74 Ariz. at page 283 , ; State v. Osborne, supra.
Porter v. Eyer 294 P.2d 661 Ariz. 1956
Porter v. Eyer 294 P.2d 661 Ariz. 1956
See, Town of South Tucson v. Board of Sup’rs, , ; , .
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Southern Union Gas Co. 265 P.2d 435 Ariz. 1954
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Southern Union Gas Co. 265 P.2d 435 Ariz. 1954
Grizzle v. Runbeck 244 P.2d 1160 Ariz. 1952
Grizzle v. Runbeck 244 P.2d 1160 Ariz. 1952
Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co. 224 P.2d 651 Ariz. 1950
Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co. 224 P.2d 651 Ariz. 1950