Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Zevon v. Tennebaum, 240 P.2d 548.

30 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Robert Fischer 392 P.3d 488 Ariz. 2017
State of Arizona v. Robert Fischer 392 P.3d 488 Ariz. 2017
Bank, –26, 296 P. 247, 249 (1931); –14 (1942); –39, State v.
Hall Family Properties, Ltd. v. Gosnell Development Corp. 916 P.2d 1098 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hall Family Properties, Ltd. v. Gosnell Development Corp. 916 P.2d 1098 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
at 246 , 367 P.2d at 269 ( , , ).
Lyle v. Boyle 492 P.2d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Lyle v. Boyle 492 P.2d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Cano v. Neill 473 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Cano v. Neill 473 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 445 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 445 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Kotsonaros v. State of Minn[esota], , ; City of Phoenix v. Harlan, supra [ , ]; , .
Rogers v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 412 P.2d 272 Ariz. 1966
Rogers v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 412 P.2d 272 Ariz. 1966
City of Phoenix v. Harlan, supra; , .
Pacific Guano Company v. Pinal County Land Company 399 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Pacific Guano Company v. Pinal County Land Company 399 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Huntsman v. First National Bank (1926) , 243 P. 598 ; Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. Citizens’ State Bank (1931) , 296 P. 247 ; Brownell v. Freedman (1932) , ; Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co. (1942) , ; Caldwell v. Tremper (1961) , ; Zevon *36 v. Tennebaum (1952) , ; Sanchez v. Stremel (1964) , .
State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
as follows: “The granting of a new trial is different from an order refusing a new trial, for in the former the rights of the parties are never finally disposed of as in the latter they may be.
Caldwell v. Tremper 367 P.2d 266 Ariz. 1962
Caldwell v. Tremper 367 P.2d 266 Ariz. 1962
this court stated: “This court has set forth on numerous occasions that it will not undertake to reverse a trial court where the evidence is conflicting.
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. McMinn 355 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1960
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. McMinn 355 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1960
City of Phoenix v. Harlan, supra; , .
Pima County v. Bilby 351 P.2d 647 Ariz. 1960
Pima County v. Bilby 351 P.2d 647 Ariz. 1960
Mayo v. Ephrom 325 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1958
Mayo v. Ephrom 325 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1958
290 P. 152 ; , 63 * , ; , .
Kotsonaros v. State of Minnesota 290 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1955
Kotsonaros v. State of Minnesota 290 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1955
General Petroleum Corp. v. Barker 269 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1954
General Petroleum Corp. v. Barker 269 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1954
Bank, , 243 P. 598 ; , 277 P. 812 ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; and Roman Catholic Church, , *244 Inasmuch as the motions for new trial were denied in the Shumway and Hicks cases, supra, we are inclined to the view that the statements therein to the effect that the trial judge is without power to reweigh the ev