Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tipton v. Burson, 238 P.2d 1098.

40 citing documents.

Hart v. Biederbeck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hart v. Biederbeck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
3 ¶ 13 (App. 2000) (“[A] battery entitling a plaintiff to compensatory damages may also entitle her to punitive damages.
Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace 763 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace 763 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Arizona courts have also found unlawful interference where the defendant secured the discharge of an employee who refused to act in an arguably criminal way, Wagenseller, 147 Ariz. at 381 , 710 P.2d at 1036 ; or wrongfully claimed the right to control water rights leased by the plaintiff to a third party, , or where a mortgagee claimed in bad faith the right to enforce a due-on-sale clause, Snow v. Western Sav.
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital 710 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1985
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital 710 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1985
We have since allowed a cause of action for interference with a lease agreement, , for inducing breach of a restrictive covenant, McNutt Oil & Refining Co. v. D’Ascoli, , for interference with an agency contract, , and for interference with business relationships, Antwerp Diamond Exch
Chanay v. Chittenden 563 P.2d 287 Ariz. 1977
Chanay v. Chittenden 563 P.2d 287 Ariz. 1977
Ulan v. Vend-A-Coin, Inc. 558 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Ulan v. Vend-A-Coin, Inc. 558 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Hannigan v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 410 F.2d 285 (7th Cir. 1969); see
Middleton v. Wallichs Music & Entertainment Co. 536 P.2d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Middleton v. Wallichs Music & Entertainment Co. 536 P.2d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
See generally, , 45 Am.Jur.2d, Interference, § 39.
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
Pre-Fit Door, Inc. v. Dor-Ways, Inc. 477 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Pre-Fit Door, Inc. v. Dor-Ways, Inc. 477 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
McNutt Oil & Refining Co. v. D’Ascoli, , , ; , Equitable Life & Casualty Ins.
Towers v. Johnson 465 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Towers v. Johnson 465 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Ong Hing v. Arizona Harness Raceway, Inc. 459 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Ong Hing v. Arizona Harness Raceway, Inc. 459 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Charron v. Kernan 447 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Charron v. Kernan 447 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Rule 51(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., Sarwark Motor Sales
Lane Title and Trust Company v. Brannan 440 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1968
Lane Title and Trust Company v. Brannan 440 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1968
Patania v. Silverstone 415 P.2d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Patania v. Silverstone 415 P.2d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Dubreuil v. Gardner 409 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1965
Dubreuil v. Gardner 409 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1965
stated: "While it is not good practice to repeat the same subject matter in several instructions after having once covered such points, the universal rule is that repetitious instructions do not constitute reversible error unless it reasonably appears that the jury were misled.
State v. Mejia 399 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1965
State v. Mejia 399 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1965
this Court clarified some earlier opinions and stated that it was not “the duty of the court on its own motion to take notice of all questions directly or collaterally involved and to instruct the jury thereon.” We held, however, that as to a vital question it was the duty of the court to
Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. Woolridge 354 P.2d 34 Ariz. 1960
Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. Woolridge 354 P.2d 34 Ariz. 1960
Layne v. Hartung 348 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1960
Layne v. Hartung 348 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1960
City of Tucson v. Koerber 313 P.2d 411 Ariz. 1957
City of Tucson v. Koerber 313 P.2d 411 Ariz. 1957
For an interesting illustration of how this court has heretofore deviated from the stringent requirements of Rule 51 (a) , .
Edwards v. Gaston 252 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1953
Edwards v. Gaston 252 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1953
Scott v. Scott 252 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1953
Scott v. Scott 252 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1953