Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Brooks, 220 P.2d 477.

28 citing documents.

Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
(holding that a Commission order authorizing a CC&N for a bus company to operate in a service area was void when a prior court judgment enjoined the bus company from operating in the same area).
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
U S West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 14 P.3d 292 Ariz. 2000
U S West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 14 P.3d 292 Ariz. 2000
at 163, 416 P.2d at 596 ( , ).
Matter of Estate of Kopely 767 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Matter of Estate of Kopely 767 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Peabody Coal Co. v. Navajo County 572 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1977
Peabody Coal Co. v. Navajo County 572 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1977
State v. Boykin 538 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1975
State v. Boykin 538 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1975
State v. Griffith, supra.
Del Rogers v. Ogg 416 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1966
Del Rogers v. Ogg 416 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1966
It is final and conclusive upon the superior courts and the judges thereof, and they may not question such judgment, neither are they permitted to hamper or impede the due and timely execution of such judgment.’ ” , .
Spector v. McFate 387 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1963
Spector v. McFate 387 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1963
Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc. v. Williams 380 P.2d 1019 Ariz. 1963
Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc. v. Williams 380 P.2d 1019 Ariz. 1963
The Superior Court issued its order on that authority, , : “If any dignity and respect is to be given to judicial proceedings, and if there is to be any end to litigation, such tactics can not be countenanced.
Harbel Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 345 P.2d 427 Ariz. 1959
Harbel Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 345 P.2d 427 Ariz. 1959
Pintek v. Superior Court of Arizona 304 P.2d 392 Ariz. 1956
Pintek v. Superior Court of Arizona 304 P.2d 392 Ariz. 1956
Murray v. Thomas 298 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1956
Murray v. Thomas 298 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1956
State Ex Rel. Mahoney v. Superior Court 275 P.2d 887 Ariz. 1954
State Ex Rel. Mahoney v. Superior Court 275 P.2d 887 Ariz. 1954
we stated: “ ‘ * * * so long as anything remains to be done under a void judgment or order, prohibition may prevent the doing of it.’ ” See also, People ex rel.
Metropolitan Lines, Inc. v. Brooks 220 P.2d 480 Ariz. 1950
Metropolitan Lines, Inc. v. Brooks 220 P.2d 480 Ariz. 1950
This is a companion case to an original prohibition proceeding entitled Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Brooks, Ariz., .