Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marsh v. Riskas, 236 P.2d 746.

34 citing documents.

Tarr v. Superior Court in & for Pima County 690 P.2d 90 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Tarr v. Superior Court in & for Pima County 690 P.2d 90 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
Shemaitis v. Superior Court, 114 Ariz. at 289 , 560 P.2d at 807 ( , ).
Cockerham v. Zikratch 619 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1980
Cockerham v. Zikratch 619 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1980
Brandt v. Daman Trailer Sales, Inc. 569 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Brandt v. Daman Trailer Sales, Inc. 569 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Shemaitis v. Superior Court 560 P.2d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Shemaitis v. Superior Court 560 P.2d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
it was stated: “To affirm the trial court’s action would mean its discretion would not be subject to review by this court.
Roll v. Janca 527 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Roll v. Janca 527 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
Coconino Pulp and Paper Co. v. Marvin, supra; , Thunderbird Farms v. Hernandez, 11 Ariz.App.
Fridena v. Palmer 489 P.2d 265 Ariz. 1971
Fridena v. Palmer 489 P.2d 265 Ariz. 1971
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
[ 17 A.L.R.3d 617 ] ; , ; , ; , ; Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc., , ; , ; Lynch *560 v. Arizona Enterprise Mining Co., , 179 P. 956 ; , 125 P. 873 .
Haenichen v. Worthington 449 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Haenichen v. Worthington 449 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 435 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Camacho v. Gardner 435 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
ault judgment, no distinction has ever been made which would suggest that the trial court has any discretion in separating the default from the default judg *592 ment on such a motion, i. e., , , , , , -432 , 234 P. 32 (1925)
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc. 426 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1967
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc. 426 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1967
Evans v. C & B DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 417 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Evans v. C & B DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 417 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co., 1 Ariz.App.
Gillette v. Lanier 406 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Gillette v. Lanier 406 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Gray v. Dillon 396 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1964
Gray v. Dillon 396 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1964
604 ; , ; Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc., , ; , ; , 179 P. 956 ; , 125 P. 873 .
Gonzales v. Whitney 367 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1961
Gonzales v. Whitney 367 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1961
Overson v. Martin 363 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1961
Overson v. Martin 363 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1961
t of the defendants upon which the trial court vacated the default was sufficient to constitute “for good cause shown.” Although there are no recent Arizona cases relating to the vacating of defaults prior to judgment, there are some cases involving the vacating of judgments entered after the default was entered: , ; , .