Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McMurtrey, 726 P.2d 202.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
  • State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
    For example, we have upheld the (F)(3) aggravating factor when the defendant shot a gun in a crowded area, or when another person was in the line of fire, Fierro, 166 Ariz. at 550, 804 P.2d at 83.
  • State v. Johnson 133 P.3d 735 Ariz. 2006
  • State v. Johnson 133 P.3d 735 Ariz. 2006
    because an F.3 aggravating circumstance may be found only when others are “physically present in the zone of danger” and may not be found when others are simply in another room, or are intended victims, “[t]he aggravating circumstance is sufficiently precise to avoid its arbitrary application.” 10 State v. McMurtrey, 151 Ariz. 105, 108
  • State v. Tucker 68 P.3d 110 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Tucker 68 P.3d 110 Ariz. 2003
    See, , (setting fire to an inmate in his cell, thus endangering nearby inmates trapped in them cells); , (shooting victims in a crowded bar); , (setting fire to the victim’s house while her children were inside); , (shooting a victim in a crowded gymnasium).
  • State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
    (presence of others in immediate area supports grave risk circumstance), cert.
  • State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
    appeal after remand, , cert.
  • State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
    1513 , 108 L.Ed.2d 649 (1990); , (no finding of significant impairment when the state experts are unequivocal in their findings while defense experts are less exact in their findings), cert.
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
    3289 , 111 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990) (trial judge is presumed to be free of bias or prejudice); , cert.
  • State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
    See State v. McMurtrey (McMurtrey II), , , cert.
  • State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
    appeal after remand, , cert.
  • State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
    appeal after remand, , cert, denied, 480 U.S. 911 , 107 S.Ct.