Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Barrett, 644 P.2d 242.

40 citing documents.

State v. Lee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
( (State’s reference in information to A.R.S.
State v. Martinson 384 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Martinson 384 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(“It cannot be seriously argued that death does not involve serious physical injury as defined by [statute].”)
State of Arizona v. Robert Michael Hollenback Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Robert Michael Hollenback Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
is adequate notice of the state’s intent to enhance [the defendant’s] sentence under that statute.” (“Th[e] recital of A.R.S.
State v. Paredes 887 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
State v. Paredes 887 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
overruled on other grounds
State v. Burge 804 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1990
State v. Burge 804 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1990
State v. Whitney 768 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1989
State v. Whitney 768 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1989
State v. Littles 749 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1988
State v. Littles 749 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1988
Specifically, he alleges that the prosecutor filed no separate allegation of dangerousness pursuant to this court’s , (“If charges are brought by indictment ...
State v. Cannon 713 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1985
State v. Cannon 713 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1985
mandate separate verdict forms for the finding of dangerousness.
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
(whether specific finding of dangerousness is required depends upon whether the second degree murder instruction required a finding of dangerousness).
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Thomas 714 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Thomas 714 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Waggoner 697 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1985
State v. Waggoner 697 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1985
we held that when the information charging the defendant referred to A.R.S.
State v. Suniga 701 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Suniga 701 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
State v. Caldera 688 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1984
State v. Caldera 688 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1984
State v. Morales 679 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Morales 679 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
§ 13-604(K) as follows: “For the purposes of this subsection, ‘dangerous nature of the felony’ means a felony involving the use or exhibition of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument or the intentional or knowing infliction of serious physical injury upon another.” , : “It cannot be seriously argued that death does not involve serious physical injury as defined by A.R.S.
State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Miller 658 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Miller 658 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
the supreme court held that a conviction for second degree murder pursuant to A.R.S.
State v. Encinas 647 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1982
State v. Encinas 647 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1982
(1982) (death involves serious physical injury).