DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hunter, 688 P.2d 980.

264 citing documents.

  • State v. Albrecht 762 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Albrecht 762 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
    Albrecht primarily relies upon State v. Hunter, 142 * P.2d 980 (1984)
  • State v. Cannon 755 P.2d 412 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Cannon 755 P.2d 412 Ariz. 1988
    we held that it was fundamental error not to advise the jury specifically that the state must disprove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted in self-defense.
  • State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
    4 , appellant argues it was fundamental error for the trial court to refuse his proffered self-defense instruction.
  • State v. Govan 744 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Govan 744 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
    SELF-DEFENSE INSTRUCTION At the close of the case, the trial court instructed the jury on self-defense using the same Recommended Arizona Jury Instruction that was held to be fundamental *613
  • State v. Cole 734 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Cole 734 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
    The central question presented for our determination is whether our supreme court’s , holding instruction of a jury pursuant to Recommended Arizona Jury Instruction 4.01 is fundamental error, is to be given fully retroactive effect.
  • State v. Davis 714 P.2d 884 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Davis 714 P.2d 884 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986