Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hunter, 664 P.2d 195.

115 citing documents.

State v. Hargrave 234 P.3d 569 Ariz. 2010
State v. Hargrave 234 P.3d 569 Ariz. 2010
State v. Johnson 72 P.3d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Johnson 72 P.3d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
hnson, , (‘Where there is the possibility that the defendant was convicted on deficient jury instructions, the conviction must be reversed.”); , (possibility that jury convicted defendant of first degree murder based on deficient instruction constitutes fundamental error); , (-3 , -87 (App.1980), for the proposition that an “instruction that is correct statement of law but is incomplete is improper”).
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
The court also concluded that such reflection could be “as instantaneous as the consecutive thoughts of the human mind.”
State v. McKeon 38 P.3d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Each of these acts when committed by a criminal suspect has been adjudged to manifest a suspect’s consciousness of guilt, which in turn “gives rise to an inference of actual guilt.” , (flight and concealment of self); , (flight); , (flight and concealment of evidence).
State v. Rodriguez 961 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1998
State v. Rodriguez 961 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1998
State v. Ramirez 945 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Ramirez 945 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
A frequently-cited source of the problematic “instantaneous as successive thoughts” -33 , -20 (1951)
State v. Thornton 929 P.2d 676 Ariz. 1996
State v. Thornton 929 P.2d 676 Ariz. 1996
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
146 , 50 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976)
State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568 869 P.2d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568 869 P.2d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
146 , 50 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976), overruled in part on other grounds
State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
-50 , -200 (1983), this court held that the same motive instruction now under consideration, although a correct statement of the law, was an incomplete statement of the law.
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
(quoting 2 J. Wigmore, Evidence in Trials at Common Law § 276, at 129-30 (J. Chadbourn rev. 1979)).
State v. Youngblood 844 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Youngblood 844 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
(negligent loss of potentially exculpatory evidence prejudicial even with Willits instruction) -51 , -201 (1983) (negligent loss of potentially exculpatory evidence prejudicial without Willits instruction), , (failure to obtain possession of material evidence plus actual prejudice requires Willits instruction).
State v. Ritacca 819 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Ritacca 819 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Guerra 778 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1989
State v. Guerra 778 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1989
overruled on other grounds, , .50
State v. Lopez 762 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1988
State v. Lopez 762 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1988
State v. Tucker 759 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1988
State v. Tucker 759 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1988
State v. Broughton 752 P.2d 483 Ariz. 1988
State v. Broughton 752 P.2d 483 Ariz. 1988
State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Ferguson 717 P.2d 879 Ariz. 1986
State v. Ferguson 717 P.2d 879 Ariz. 1986
In support of his position
State v. Coleman 711 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Coleman 711 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Kreps 706 P.2d 1213 Ariz. 1985
State v. Kreps 706 P.2d 1213 Ariz. 1985
State v. Salazar 707 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Salazar 707 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985