Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Walker, 675 P.2d 1310.

21 citing documents.

  • Penn-America Insurance v. Sanchez 202 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    Co., , (emphasis added), approved by
  • PUEBLO SANTA FE TOWNHOMES OWNERS'ASS'N v. Transcontinental Insurance Co. 178 P.3d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    Co., , (insurer must notify insured “promptly” and “without delay”) (internal quotation and citation omitted), approved by , see also Ogden v. U.S. Fid.
  • State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
  • State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
    (finding an instruction that misstates the law is an error).
  • State v. Huerstel 75 P.3d 698 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Huerstel 75 P.3d 698 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Benenati 52 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • State v. Hoskins 14 P.3d 997 Ariz. 2000
  • State v. Hoskins 14 P.3d 997 Ariz. 2000
    provided the statements were obtained without violation of the traditional standards for evaluating voluntariness and trustworthiness.” , (citing Oregon v. Hass, 420 U.S. 714 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Pettit 979 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Pettit 979 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
    (statements obtained in violation of Miranda may nevertheless be used to impeach defendant at trial provided they were voluntarily made).
  • State v. Conner 786 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Conner 786 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1990
    643 , 28 L.Ed.2d 1 (1971) (voluntary statements taken in violation of Miranda admissible to impeach)
  • State v. Rendon 776 P.2d 353 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Rendon 776 P.2d 353 Ariz. 1989
    (arson); , (trafficking in stolen property); State v. O’Brien, , (conspiracy); , (assault with a deadly weapon); State v. Goodman, 22 Ariz.App.
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
    Co., , the Arizona Supreme Court stated: However, while denial of review usually attests our approval of the result reached by the court of appeals, it does not necessarly indicate our approval of the legal analysis contained in the opinion.
  • State v. Carrillo 750 P.2d 883 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Carrillo 750 P.2d 883 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Williams 742 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Williams 742 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1987
    (arson); , (trafficking in stolen property); State v. O’Brien, , (conspiracy); , (assault with a deadly weapon); State v. Goodman, 22 Ariz.App.
  • Cota v. Industrial Indemnity Co. 687 P.2d 1281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    Co., , approved and adopted, , by Arizona Supreme Court, No. 17193 (1984).