Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Graham, 660 P.2d 460.

68 citing documents.

State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
This circumstance is applied to murders having a “financial motivation.” State v. Villafuerte, supra at 328 , 690 P.2d at 47; , , , cert.
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 207 Ariz. 1985
This circumstance is applied to murders having a “financial motivation.” , , , , cert.
State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
See, , (defendant’s capacity to appreciate wrongfulness of act, his drug addiction caused by mental health treatment since age seven, his lack of adult convictions, his non-violent juvenile criminal record, and fact that friend influenced him at time of crime outweighed fact that crime was committed wit
State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
Madison Granite Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 676 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Madison Granite Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 676 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Despite the apparent ironclad statements in Bilbrey , Arizona courts routinely look beyond titles and inquire into a witness’ actual “knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.” , the supreme court found that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in allowing a police detective to testify that he had observed rigor mortis in the victim’s body and to testify to his conclusions about how the victim died and .how long he had been dead.
State v. Radjenovich 674 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Radjenovich 674 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
See, e.g., State v. McDaniel, supra (finding of lack of intent to kill outweighed finding that the killing was done in a cruel manner); , (findings of defendant’s diminished capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct, lack of other adult convictions, and no tendency toward violent crime outweighed finding that the killing was done for pecuniary gain); , (young age of def
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
(defendant did not intend to kill); , (substantial mental impairment due to medically-induced drug addiction, neurological problems, and brain damage; vulnerability to influence; lack of pri- or record of violence); , (extreme youth of defendant — sixteen years old at the time of h
State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983