Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Williams v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 237 P.2d 471.

26 citing documents.

Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 226 P.3d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 226 P.3d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
Langbell v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 227 Ariz. 1974
Langbell v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 227 Ariz. 1974
concern “unscheduled” disabilities and provides compensation in those cases not listed as “scheduled” in subparagraph B. Unlike compensation awards for certain scheduled injuries such as loss of limb or organ which are made with or without a loss of earning power, , the State Compensation Fund makes awards for unscheduled injuries only if there is a disability for work which results in loss of earning power.
Bozman v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Bozman v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Scott v. Industrial Commission, 11 Ariz.App.
Oliver v. Industrial Commission 481 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Oliver v. Industrial Commission 481 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Milam v. Industrial Commission 470 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Milam v. Industrial Commission 470 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Scott v. Industrial Commission 461 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Scott v. Industrial Commission 461 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Sims v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Sims v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Corrier v. Industrial Commission 411 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Corrier v. Industrial Commission 411 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Petitioner was entitled only to a loss of earnings award to be arrived at as indicated above, which was the formula used in the making of the award under review.” at 60, 61 , at 474 (1951).
Allen v. Industrial Commission 347 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1959
Allen v. Industrial Commission 347 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1959
In both Williams v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 1951, , and Engle v. Industrial Commission, 1954, , , the employee sustained multiple scheduled injuries.
Morris v. Industrial Commission 299 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1956
Morris v. Industrial Commission 299 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1956
The rule of the Ossie case as to multiple injuries falling into the “odd lot” classification was affirmed in Williams, v. Indus *72 trial Commission, , , which was another multiple injury case (simultaneous injuries to right foot and left arm), , (involving simultaneous injuries to both hands).
Scott v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 296 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1956
Scott v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 296 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1956
*286 It should be noted that petitioner is not asking to be compensated for a scheduled injury to his arm and in addition thereto to be compensated for his “loss of earning” capacity, , , , .
Engle v. Industrial Commission 269 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1954
Engle v. Industrial Commission 269 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1954