Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Zuck, 658 P.2d 162.

173 citing documents.

State v. Hastings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Hastings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.” (citation omitted)).
State v. Trujillo 430 P.3d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Trujillo 430 P.3d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
608(b) (on cross-examination, specific instances of conduct admissible if probative of character for truthfulness); see also State v. Zuck , , 513, , 166 (1982) ( Rule 403 helps protect against cross-examination that does little to impair credibility).
State v. Sotelo-Nava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sotelo-Nava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”).
State v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–13 (1982) (“It is the duty of counsel who raise objections on appeal to see that the record before us contains the material to which they take exception.”).
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.” (citation omitted).
State v. Swindle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Swindle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
State v. Molinar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Molinar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(missing portions of the record are presumed to support superior court's action).
State v. Juarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Juarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Koley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Koley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Because it “is the duty of counsel” to ensure the record “contains the material to which they take exception,” when “matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
State v. Sales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Sales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(noting delays sought by defense counsel bind the client and constitute waiver of right to speedy trial even if done without the defendant’s consent).
State v. Adkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Adkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”).
State v. Valentine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Valentine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
("Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.").
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Puccini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Puccini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Fingi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Fingi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”).
State v. Recchia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Recchia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cravets Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cravets Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“If evidence is objected to on one ground and admitted over the objection, other grounds not specified are waived.”
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”).
State v. Morales-Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morales-Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Jerry Alan Nuckols Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Jerry Alan Nuckols Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
“Where matters are not included in the record on appeal, the missing portions of the record will be presumed to support the action of the trial court.”
State v. Delahanty 250 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2011
State v. Delahanty 250 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2011