DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Smith, 687 P.2d 1265.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Womble 235 P.3d 244 Ariz. 2010
  • State v. Womble 235 P.3d 244 Ariz. 2010
    11 -12, -67 (1984)); (killing five-year-old daughter “for no reason other than to eliminate her as a witness” to her mother’s murder supports finding of depravity); (
  • State v. Johnson 133 P.3d 735 Ariz. 2006
  • State v. Johnson 133 P.3d 735 Ariz. 2006
    ¶59 “Ending the life of a human being so that that person cannot testify against the defendant indicates a complete lack of understanding of the value of a human life.” State v. Smith, 35 (noting “depravity is indicated” where witness elimination occurs).
  • State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
    1775 , 84 L.Ed.2d 834 (1985); -12 , -67 (1984).
  • State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
    Greenway, 170 Ariz. at 174 , 823 P.2d at 41 ( , , , did not hold that killing merely to eliminate a witness was an aggravating circumstance).
  • State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
    1775 , 84 L.Ed.2d 834 (1985)
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
    660 , 116 L.Ed.2d 751 (1991) (relationship between defendant and victim); -12 , -67 (1984) (killing to eliminate witness).
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
    1775 , 84 L.Ed.2d 834 (1985) (defendant in his pro se brief argued that it made sense to kill and “eliminate the only possible witness to the crime of kidnapping, aggravated robbery and sexual assault,” and we held this to be heinous and depraved); State v. Smith (Roger Lynn), -12 , -67 (1984) (defendant killed so that the victim could not testify against him).
  • State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
  • State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
    See State v. (Roger Lynn) Smith, -512 , -1267 (1984); State v. Hensley, supra.
  • State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984