Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. Van Denburgh, 257 P.2d 856.

32 citing documents.

Chalker v. Chalker 430 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Chalker v. Chalker 430 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. v. Van Denburgh , , ).
Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc. 329 P.3d 1043 Ariz. 2014
Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc. 329 P.3d 1043 Ariz. 2014
(holding that interest on an unliquidated claim is available only from the date of judgment); Ariz. E. R.R.
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Gunther & Shirley Company, 5 Ariz.App.
State v. Warren 604 P.2d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Warren 604 P.2d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
County of Maricopa v. Sperry Rand Corporation 544 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1976
County of Maricopa v. Sperry Rand Corporation 544 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1976
P.2d 856 (1953); Home Owners’
Barrett v. Melton 545 P.2d 421 Ariz. 1976
Barrett v. Melton 545 P.2d 421 Ariz. 1976
Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 519 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 519 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Skok v. City of Glendale 413 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Skok v. City of Glendale 413 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
While it is true that if there is sufficient competent evidence to sustain the judgment other than improperly admitted evidence, that the Court will sustain the judgment on appeal particularly when the court was sitting without a jury, , a review of the evidence discloses that without the testimony contained in the deposition of Barclay, the judgment cannot stand.
Feighner v. Clarke 408 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Feighner v. Clarke 408 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
it was held that on an unliquidated claim interest should only be allowed from date of judgment.” at 250 , at 149 (1959).
State v. Garcia 397 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1964
State v. Garcia 397 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1964
In Re Sherrill's Estate 373 P.2d 353 Ariz. 1962
Rice v. Groseclose 373 P.2d 353 Ariz. 1962
In Re Sherrill's Estate 373 P.2d 353 Ariz. 1962
Rice v. Groseclose 373 P.2d 353 Ariz. 1962
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
Collison v. International Ins.
Parker v. State Ex Rel. Church 359 P.2d 63 Ariz. 1961
Parker v. State Ex Rel. Church 359 P.2d 63 Ariz. 1961
offered and received, if the competent evidence is sufficient to support the judgment it will be sustained regardless of the error.” , ; , 203 P. 554 .
Schwartz v. Schwerin 336 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1959
Schwartz v. Schwerin 336 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1959
it was held that on an unliquidated claim interest should only be allowed from date of judgment.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by