Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stallcup v. Rathbun, 258 P.2d 821.

68 citing documents.

Curlee v. Steward 379 P.2d 458 Ariz. 1963
Curlee v. Steward 379 P.2d 458 Ariz. 1963
Based upon this evidence, and the entire lack of any manifestations of passion or prejudice, or any event that would cause passion or prejudice in the jury dur *188 ing the course of the trial, we cannot say these damages are flagrantly excessive
Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. Montoya 372 P.2d 703 Ariz. 1962
Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. Montoya 372 P.2d 703 Ariz. 1962
On this problem Justice Udall, , , 824 said: «* * * a flagrantly outrageous verdict was declared by this court in Standard Oil Co. v. Shields, supra, [ , ] to be a fifth ground upon which to predicate a finding of passion and prejudice.
McNelis v. Bruce 367 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1961
McNelis v. Bruce 367 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1961
Moore v. Menges 361 P.2d 9 Ariz. 1961
Moore v. Menges 361 P.2d 9 Ariz. 1961
2S the question of liability as well as the question of damages was submitted to the jury and the jury returned its verdict in thirty-four minutes.
City of Yuma v. Evans 336 P.2d 135 Ariz. 1959
City of Yuma v. Evans 336 P.2d 135 Ariz. 1959
Mayo v. Ephrom 325 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1958
Mayo v. Ephrom 325 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1958
33 P. 710 , 711: “ ‘ * * * Of course, if it is apparent to the trial court that the verdict was the result of passion or prejudice, a remittitur should not be allowed, but the verdict should be set
Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Cathey 317 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1957
Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Cathey 317 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1957
In short, the damages must be flagrantly outrageous and extravagant * * , .
Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Parsons 293 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1956
Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Parsons 293 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1956
Recently, in Stallcup v. Rathbun, 1953, , , the entire question of excessive damages, as well as passion and prejudice on the part of the jury, was discussed at length, and, reaffirming the above statement from the Standard Oil case, we declared that for an appellate court to “predicate a finding of passion and prejudice” upon an award
Town & Country Securities Co. v. Place 285 P.2d 165 Ariz. 1955
Town & Country Securities Co. v. Place 285 P.2d 165 Ariz. 1955