Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hallman, 668 P.2d 874.
- Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel 719 P.2d 1058 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Griffin 713 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Griffin 713 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Druke 693 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
State v. Druke
693 P.2d 969
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
(expert testimony of defendant’s mild retardation and organic brain syndrome admissible to substantiate defendant’s credibility as well as his “mere presence” defense).
- State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Chaney
686 P.2d 1265
Ariz. 1984
that if an item of evidence may tend to inflame, it may be admitted only if it is relevant and its probative value outweighs the danger of prejudice.
- State v. Kerekes 673 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Kerekes 673 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
- State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983