Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Glowacki v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc., 263 P.2d 799.
- Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly 800 P.2d 962 Ariz. 1990
-
Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly
800 P.2d 962
Ariz. 1990
Bayless Mkts., Inc., , and Restatement (Second) of Agency § 277, the court found facts “from which it could be inferred that Ft.
- Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly 784 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
-
Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly
784 P.2d 699
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Bayless Markets, Inc., , and Restatement (Second) of Agency § 277 (1965).
- McDonald v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 757 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- McDonald v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 757 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Jackson v. Cartwright School District 607 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Distinguished Jackson v. Cartwright School District 607 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Chavez v. Tolleson Elementary School District 595 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Chavez v. Tolleson Elementary School District 595 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability Insurance 542 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1975
- Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability Insurance 542 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1975
- Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Company 537 P.2d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Company 537 P.2d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.
511 P.2d 699
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Glowacki v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc., , Rhodes v. El Rancho Markets, 9 Ariz.App.
- Pierce v. Lopez 490 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
-
Pierce v. Lopez
490 P.2d 1182
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Bank of Arizona, , , Loya v. Fong, 1 Ariz.App.
- Dodge City Motors, Inc. v. Rogers 490 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Dodge City Motors, Inc. v. Rogers 490 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Rodriguez v. Williams 489 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1971
- Rodriguez v. Williams 489 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1971
- El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin 475 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
-
El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin
475 P.2d 961
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Defendant next objects to the court’s instruction number 2 which is as follows: “A greater duty rests upon one engaged in selling merchandise, to discover whether a dangerous condition exists on the premises, than devolves upon his invitee who has a right to assume that the premises are reasonably safe for her use.” , Heth v. Del Webb’s Highway Inn
- Hing v. Youtsey 460 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- Hing v. Youtsey 460 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- State v. Sheffield 451 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Sheffield
451 P.2d 607
Ariz. 1969
Glowacki v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc., , .
- City of Tucson v. Sanderson 449 P.2d 616 Ariz. 1969
- City of Tucson v. Sanderson 449 P.2d 616 Ariz. 1969
- Heth v. Del Webb's Highway Inn 429 P.2d 442 Ariz. 1967
- Heth v. Del Webb's Highway Inn 429 P.2d 442 Ariz. 1967
- Daugherty v. Montgomery Ward 428 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1967
- Daugherty v. Montgomery Ward 428 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1967
- Patania v. Silverstone 415 P.2d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
-
Patania v. Silverstone
415 P.2d 139
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
That is the ruling of the court.” , stated that in order to determine whether a statement by the court is a comment upon the evidence the statement should be examined in light of the circumstances and context in which it was made.
- McKeever v. Phoenix Jewish Community Center 374 P.2d 875 Ariz. 1962
- McKeever v. Phoenix Jewish Community Center 374 P.2d 875 Ariz. 1962
- In Re the Estate of Schade 351 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1960
- In Re the Estate of Schade 351 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1960
- Wisniski v. Ong 329 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1958
-
Wisniski v. Ong
329 P.2d 1097
Ariz. 1958
We have considered the evidence here most strongly in favor of sustaining the jury’s verdict, for if reasonable inferences can be drawn in support thereof, it was error for the trial court to grant the motion for .a , .
- Goodman v. Carson 325 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1958
- Goodman v. Carson 325 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1958
- Busy Bee Buffet, Inc. v. Ferrell 310 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1957
- Busy Bee Buffet, Inc. v. Ferrell 310 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1957
- Zugsmith v. Mullins 299 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1956
- Zugsmith v. Mullins 299 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1956
- Crouse v. Wilbur-Ellis Co. 272 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1954
- Crouse v. Wilbur-Ellis Co. 272 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1954