Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite General Alarm, Inc. v. Underdown, 262 P.2d 671.

26 citing documents.

Southwest Transmission Cooperative, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 142 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Southwest Transmission Cooperative, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 142 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 922 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1996
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 922 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1996
must be such as to make its rates, charges and methods of operation a matter of public concern, clothed with a public interest to the extent contemplated by law which subjects it to governmental control — its business must be of such a nature that competition might lead to abuse detrimental to the public interest.” 86 Ariz. at 34-35 , 339 P.2d at 1052 ; see also General Alarm, -39 , -73 (1953) (holding classification as public service corporation requires that business and activities be such tha
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 909 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 909 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
American Cable Television, Inc. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 693 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
American Cable Television, Inc. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 693 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
General Alarm, , is particularly instructive as it deals with the carriage of messages and interpreted the Arizona Constitution.
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 644 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 644 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Rural/Metro Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 629 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Rural/Metro Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 629 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
(Armored car service does not constitute engaging in business as a common or contract carrier, subject to Commission regulation, but rather, the transportation involved is merely an incidental part of the protection service provided); General Alarm
Petrolane-Arizona Gas Service v. Arizona Corp. Commission 580 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1978
Petrolane-Arizona Gas Service v. Arizona Corp. Commission 580 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1978
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Nicholson 497 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1972
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Nicholson 497 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1972
we held that a corporation maintaining an emergency signal and alarm system as part of the burglary services it offered, was not a public service corporation within the meaning of Art. 15, § 2.
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security Guards 443 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1968
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security Guards 443 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1968
* * * ” We said in General Alarm, , : “To be a public service corporation, its business and activities must be such as to make its rates, charges, and methods of operation a matter of public concern.
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security Guards 426 P.2d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security Guards 426 P.2d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Such invasion of private right cannot be allowed by implication or strained construction.”
Visco v. State Ex Rel. Pickrell 388 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1963
Visco v. State Ex Rel. Pickrell 388 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1963
the issue was whether a certificate of convenience and necessity could be required of a corporation maintaining an emergency signal and fire alarm system.
Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Corporation Commission 339 P.2d 1046 Ariz. 1959
Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Corporation Commission 339 P.2d 1046 Ariz. 1959
In refusing to hold that a general alarm system was a public service corporation and not subject to regulation by the Corporation Commission we said in General Alarm, , , that to be a public service corporation its business and activities must be such as to make its rates, charges and methods of operation, a matter of public concern, *35 clothed with a public interest to the extent contemplated by law which subjects it to governmental control — its business must be of