Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Haas, 675 P.2d 673.
- State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Krantz 848 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- State v. Krantz 848 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- State v. Clough 829 P.2d 1263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
State v. Clough
829 P.2d 1263
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
the supreme court defined “scheme or artifice” as some “plan, device, or trick” to perpetrate a fraud.
- State v. Vierra 785 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- State v. Vierra 785 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- State v. Guerra 778 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Guerra
778 P.2d 1185
Ariz. 1989
(even if particular instruction misleading, other statements made by judge cured problem).
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Tolleson 773 P.2d 490 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Tolleson 773 P.2d 490 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Bridgeforth 750 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1988
-
State v. Bridgeforth
750 P.2d 3
Ariz. 1988
we noted the construction placed on these terms by the federal courts: The federal mail fraud statute encompasses a broad range of fraudulent activities.
- State v. Sommer 745 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Sommer 745 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- SCA Construction Supply v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 746 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- SCA Construction Supply v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 746 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987