Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Yslas, 676 P.2d 1118.
- Stoddard v. Donahoe 228 P.3d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Stoddard v. Donahoe 228 P.3d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Andrew G. v. Peasley-Fimbres 165 P.3d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
Andrew G. v. Peasley-Fimbres
165 P.3d 182
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Actions 3(b), 17B A.R.S.; (constitutional issues not addressed unless necessary to determine merits).
- Pamela Manic v. Tucson City Attorney's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
-
Pamela Manic v. Tucson City Attorney's Office
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
(“[W]e do not determine constitutional issues unless a decision is necessary to determine the merits of the action.”).
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Antonio Aleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Antonio Aleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
- State v. Clary 2 P.3d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 993 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 993 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- State v. Taylor 931 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. Taylor 931 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Espinoza v. Martin 894 P.2d 688 Ariz. 1995
- Espinoza v. Martin 894 P.2d 688 Ariz. 1995
- In re 1986 Chevrolet Corvette 905 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1994
- In re 1986 Chevrolet Corvette 905 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1994
- Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
-
Hayes v. Continental Insurance
872 P.2d 668
Ariz. 1994
See Petolicchio, 177 Ariz. at 259 , 866 P.2d at 1345 ; Dunn, 177 Ariz. at 196 , 866 P.2d at 864
- Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n 866 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1994
-
Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n
866 P.2d 1342
Ariz. 1994
School Dish No. 26 v. Strohm
- State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Bible
858 P.2d 1152
Ariz. 1993
2531, 2538-39 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980)
- Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
- Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
- Tucson Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 854 P.2d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Tucson Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
854 P.2d 1162
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
(supreme court will not determine constitutional issues unless necessary to determine merits of actions); Nunez v. Arizona Milling Company, 7 Ariz.App.
- State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
-
State v. Greenway
823 P.2d 22
Ariz. 1991
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) , and have found none.
- State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
- State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Anaya 799 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
State v. Anaya
799 P.2d 876
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
2128 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1356 (1967) (nervous excitement); -56 , (same); Barnes, 124 Ariz. at 589-90 , 606 P.2d at 805-06 (state of shock); Jeffers, 135 Ariz. at 420 , 661 P.2d at 1121 (stress and excitement); , (physical and emotional condition); Rivera, 139 Ariz. at 411-13 , 678 P.2d at 1375-77 (same); Whitney, 159 Ariz. at 483 , 768 P.2d at 645 (same).
- Schwab v. Matley 793 P.2d 1088 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Steiger 781 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Steiger 781 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Whitney 768 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Whitney
768 P.2d 638
Ariz. 1989
McCORMICK, EVIDENCE § 297, at 706 (2d ed. 1972); see also Barnes, 124 Ariz. at 589-90 , 606 P.2d at 805-06 (statements made in state of shock are admissible even though they were not made immediately after the event); , (declar-ant’s physical and emotional condition is “the important thing”).
- State v. Gaydas 766 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- State v. Gaydas 766 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel Board 766 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel Board 766 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Stanley 753 P.2d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
-
State v. Stanley
753 P.2d 182
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Ariz.R.Evid., 801(d)(2)(E), 17A A.R.S.; -64 , -22 (1984).
- State v. Miller 755 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- State v. Miller 755 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- State v. Carr 743 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1987
- State v. Carr 743 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1987