Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite General Petroleum Corp. v. Barker, 269 P.2d 729.

70 citing documents.

  • State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
  • State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
    * * *» “ * * , the court said: “We have examined the cases * * and have come to this conclusion: .A motion for new trial upon the ground the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and in ruling thereon the trial court may weigh the evidence.
  • Gilmore v. Cohen 386 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1963
  • Gilmore v. Cohen 386 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1963
    This amounted to trial of the issue by implied consent, , ; , ; , 288 P. 1029 (1930), and it will be treated as if raised in the pleadings.
  • Layton v. Rocha 368 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1962
  • Caldwell v. Tremper 367 P.2d 266 Ariz. 1962
  • Caldwell v. Tremper 367 P.2d 266 Ariz. 1962
    we held that where a motion for new trial is based upon the claim that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence the trial court may weigh the evidence, and such an order will only be set aside when it affirmatively appears the order is unreasonable and a manifest abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Bogard 354 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1960
  • State v. Bogard 354 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1960
    Blakely Oil, , ; , ; , ; , .
  • Pima County v. Bilby 351 P.2d 647 Ariz. 1960
  • Pima County v. Bilby 351 P.2d 647 Ariz. 1960
  • Thompson v. Quandt 321 P.2d 1012 Ariz. 1958
  • Thompson v. Quandt 321 P.2d 1012 Ariz. 1958
  • Blakely Oil, Inc. v. Wells Truckways, Ltd. 320 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1958
  • Blakely Oil, Inc. v. Wells Truckways, Ltd. 320 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1958
    735: “We have examined the cases * * * and have come to this conclusion: A motion for new trial upon the ground the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and in ruling thereon the trial court may weigh the evidence.
  • Bryan v. Southern Pacific Company 286 P.2d 761 Ariz. 1955
  • Smith v. Moroney 282 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1955
  • Smith v. Moroney 282 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1955
    735: “We have examined the cases * * * and have come to this conclusion: A motion for new trial upon the ground the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and in ruling thereon the trial coupt may weigh the evidence.
  • State v. Chase 278 P.2d 423 Ariz. 1954
  • State v. Chase 278 P.2d 423 Ariz. 1954