Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Amarillas, 688 P.2d 628.

34 citing documents.

State v. Uriarte-Velazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Uriarte-Velazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Offret Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Offret Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Kummer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Kummer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶21 “Generally, evidence of other wrongs may not be used ‘to show that a defendant is a bad person or has a propensity for committing crimes.’” ¶ 54, ( and citing Ariz. R. Evid.
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
- 27 - for committing crimes.” (citation omitted); see also Ariz. R. Evid.
Peak v. Acuna 50 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2002
Peak v. Acuna 50 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2002
(greater offense cannot be committed without committing lesser); State v. Welch, 198 Ariz. 554, (same).
State v. Vasko 971 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Vasko 971 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Ramirez 945 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Ramirez 945 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
We note that the supreme court, , advised that the statutory “instant effect” sentence should not be given unless there is “evidence from which the jury could have found that the killing was manslaughter.” No such evidence exists in Appellant’s case.
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Cook 834 P.2d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Cook 834 P.2d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
State v. Jackson 760 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Jackson 760 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Ferreira 731 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Ferreira 731 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
Rule 21.3, Ariz.R.Crim.P., 17 A.R.S.
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
“An offense is a lesser included one only where the greater offense cannot be committed without necessarily committing the lesser.”
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Sullivan, 130 Ariz. at 215, 635 P.2d at 503 (1981).