Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Henderson v. Breesman, 269 P.2d 1059.

45 citing documents.

Leland v. Auto Nation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leland v. Auto Nation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶19 should guide the result here, that case is inapposite.
Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
While we recognize that a trial court may exclude photographs when there is some evidence that they are inaccurate, see, , the failure to do so does not necessarily constitute an abuse of discretion.
Smith v. Delvin 728 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Smith v. Delvin 728 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
: [A] driver having the right of way ...
Saide v. Stanton 659 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1983
Saide v. Stanton 659 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1983
-03 , , -62 (1954); , 556—59, 199 P. 132, 136-37 (1920); Valley National Bank v. Haney, 27 Ariz.App.
Wait v. City of Scottsdale 618 P.2d 601 Ariz. 1980
Wait v. City of Scottsdale 618 P.2d 601 Ariz. 1980
Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Haney 558 P.2d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Haney 558 P.2d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ray v. Starr 539 P.2d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Ray v. Starr 539 P.2d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Besch v. Triplett 532 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Besch v. Triplett 532 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Charron v. Kernan, 8 Ariz.App.
Falcher v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 506 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Falcher v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 506 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Han v. Horwitz, 2 Ariz.App.
Villegas v. Bryson 494 P.2d 61 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Villegas v. Bryson 494 P.2d 61 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Gallagher v. Viking Supply Corp., 3 Ariz.App.
Charron v. Kernan 447 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Charron v. Kernan 447 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
: “ * * * We are unable, however, to find any evidence that would authorize the jury to consider future medical expenses or permanent impairment of earning capacity.
O'Rielly Motor Company v. Rich 411 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
O'Rielly Motor Company v. Rich 411 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 132.
City of Tucson v. Holliday 411 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
City of Tucson v. Holliday 411 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Henderson v. Breesman, supra.” [ , ]
Han v. Horwitz 407 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Han v. Horwitz 407 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Throop v. F. E. Young & Co.
Griffen v. Stevenson 402 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Griffen v. Stevenson 402 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Peterson v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 391 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1964
Egurrola v. Szychowski 388 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1964
Egurrola v. Szychowski 388 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1964
cited Nichols for tht proposition that: “[A] driver having the right of way * * * is still under an obligation to make that degree of observation * * * [which] a reasonably prudent person would have made under such conditions.”
Throop v. FE Young and Company 382 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1963
Throop v. FE Young and Company 382 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1963
Davis v. Weber 380 P.2d 608 Ariz. 1963
Davis v. Weber 380 P.2d 608 Ariz. 1963
Sheehy v. Murphy 380 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1963
Sheehy v. Murphy 380 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1963
Layne v. Hartung 348 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1960
Layne v. Hartung 348 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1960
we recognized this rule and said: “ * * * The mere fact that a driver approaching an intersection from the right might have the right of way.
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Henderson 313 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1957
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Henderson 313 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1957
Hirsh v. Manley 300 P.2d 588 Ariz. 1956
Hirsh v. Manley 300 P.2d 588 Ariz. 1956
In the very recent case of Henderson v. Breesman, 1954, , , we cited the Mullen case with approval, reaffirming the proposition that in certain situations the nature of the injuries may warrant an instruction as to their being permanent even in the absence of medical proof.