Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kelton, 285 P.2d 168.

27 citing documents.

HSBC v. Cluff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
HSBC v. Cluff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-31 (1955) (explaining a recorded instrument is constructive notice only to those bound to search for it); see also Home Owners’ (explaining an allegation of negligence in drafting a deed is insufficient to defeat a reformation action because “[m]utual mistakes
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Criticized ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Sprint, 618 F. Supp. 2d 1101, 1108 (D. Ariz. 2009); Mountain States, -28
Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-35, (holding defendant’s interference with plaintiff’s express easement over defendant’s property amounted to trespass).
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lowe v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lowe v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-31, quoting Maul v. Rider, 59 Pa.
Long v. City of Glendale 93 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Long v. City of Glendale 93 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-31 , -71 (1955) (explaining that records are constructive notice only to those bound to search for such rec *326 ords).
Davis v. Mangelsdorf 673 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Davis v. Mangelsdorf 673 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Mountain States Telephone & P.2d 168 (1955).
Chavez v. Tolleson Elementary School District 595 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Chavez v. Tolleson Elementary School District 595 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
City of Scottsdale v. Kokaska 495 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
City of Scottsdale v. Kokaska 495 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
For instance in Mountain States Telephone & , ; (1955), the court said that the duty the defendants owed plaintiff included the duty-to take reasonable precautions to prevent injuring the plaintiff and that the reasonable precautions must be measured- by the risk of anticipated harm (foreseeable harm).
Preston v. Denkins 382 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1963
Preston v. Denkins 382 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1963
City of Tucson v. Koerber 313 P.2d 411 Ariz. 1957
National Public Service Insurance Co. v. Welch 302 P.2d 926 Ariz. 1956
National Public Service Insurance Co. v. Welch 302 P.2d 926 Ariz. 1956

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by